Reply From Green Party Regarding Chemtrails: Greens need to focus on issues for which there is robust scientific evidence

Mark of Wanganui, recently wrote to the NZ Green Party about chemtrails.  He addressed it to Green Party leader,  Russel Norman and sent it on Friday, December 09, 2011.  The reply to this, follows:

Hi Russel,

No doubt you have seen those chemtrails more & more in the sky lately & after they spray,the weather gets hazy & clouds over about 4 or 5hrs later,all you get told is its aircraft trails from high altitude but you & i know thats total b/s & i fear something sinister seems to be going on & thought you being the head of the green party who stand for climate,cleanliness & a nice enviroment for the people/animals & the enviroment to all share in would be a bit suspicious on whats actually happening or do you know & cant spill the beans for some reason? seems serious to me russell,hope you can check it out or let me know just what is going on.
regards, mark baker

ps……… i would like a response on this russel please.

Here is the reply sent on  Wed, 14 Dec 2011:
Dear Mark,

Thank you for your email to Russel. Given that there are always constraints on staff capacity to work on the many issues that may be deserving of attention, the Greens need to focus on issues for which there is robust scientific evidence and broad consensus among the science community. Chemtrails do not meet this criteria. I’m sorry that we disagree on this issue.

Kind regards,
Anne

 Anne Heins | Executive Assistant | Office of Dr Russel Norman MP

Co-leader, Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand
Bowen House, Parliament Buildings, Wellington 6160, New Zealand

Whare Pāremata , Te Whanganui-a-Tara 6160, Aotearoa

E: anne.heins@parliament.govt.nz| W: www.greens.org.nz

About Clare Swinney

Committed to awakening those still asleep. Please keep an open mind and do your own research. WebofEvidence on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyTh2WC7w_8GYD6ZecXUQMQ Clare on Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/1z2iaeXTln25/
This entry was posted in Activism, Politics, Propaganda. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Reply From Green Party Regarding Chemtrails: Greens need to focus on issues for which there is robust scientific evidence

  1. Jones says:

    This is interesting – as the Greens are asking for scientific evidence for blatantly obvious chemical spraying that has gone on for a decade, but the global warming agenda (which they FULLY support) has no scientific evidence to back up that MAN is creating changes that have been going on for centuries….so they are right in there with the global warming scam of the century. The Greens are really elitists (in with Prince Charles and his cronies) and are out for the soft kill of the average citizen – so of course, they are not interested in stopping the planned poisoning of humanity.

    • Graeme says:

      Well said Jones
      Like the Democrats and Republicans in America
      “There’s not a Dime’s Difference”
      They’re all in the Pocket
      Doing what they’re told
      To further the interests of the NWO in the take over of this Country
      While projecting a False image of Legitamacy and righteousness

  2. jacquie says:

    Like your letter, Mark, and the way you make crucial points in such a mild-mannered way. If nothing else it’s drawn a response that makes perfectly clear where the Greenies stand: right alongside the white-collared professionals of the scientific community, while the “issues” that we, the citizens and voters of New Zealand, are concerned about are not “deserving of attention”. Wonderful!

    Anne Heins also makes obvious that as long as her party is only interested in “robust scientific evidence” we can never provide it because most – or none of us – are scientists. Bit of a Catch-22, eh wot?

    Looking at it from our side of the fence, however, I wonder what would constitute such evidence? A plane with tanks full of toxic spray falling out of the sky and averting disaster by making a soft landing in Parliament grounds where it could be seen and investigated by anyone? It wouldn’t look too good for Mr. Key to still insist such planes do not exist, would it? That’d make people think twice about him and chemtrails. Oh if only.

    Anyway, thanks, Mark. I was so pleased to see I’m not the ONLY person in Whanganui who looks up at the skies. If only I had a camera.

  3. Graeme says:

    Exactly Jaquie
    Anne Heins also makes obvious that as long as her party is only interested in “robust scientific evidence” we can never provide it because most – or none of us – are scientists. Bit of a Catch-22, eh wot?
    And this is the Ruse the Stumbling Block they hide behind
    Like the Moonman
    Knowing full well that until we get some professionals aboard in this field……………….or have we?
    Cheers

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s