Dominion Post Runs Propaganda Piece Concealing Scientific Evidence Which Proves Aerosol Geoengineering Is Occurring

???????????????????????????????????? On May the 18th, 2013, the Dominion Post ran a feature article titled ‘Contrails: An Evil Plot or Just a Lot of Hot Air?’  in its Green Zone section on A15, which covered up the fact that aerosol geoengineering is occurring in New Zealand and poisoning the environment. The Dominion Post journalist who wrote the article, Matt Stewart, phoned me on the 15th of May and seemed to have a genuine interest in the issue.  Consequently, I advised him that metals referred to on geoengineering patents were being found in the rainwater in New Zealand. I sent him a number of links to evidence of this, as well as an email I had received from Hill Laboratories, dated May the 15th, 2013, which showed that aluminium, barium and strontium were found in rainwater in Whangarei. I also sent him a link to hair analyses conducted in 2012, which showed that a Northlander had very high levels of aluminium, plus barium and strontium in his hair and that these were metals used in geoengineering.  Was he too lazy to look at these and realize their significance? In addition, I provided him with a link that showed anomalies in satellite imagery that can not be explained away as natural cloud formations.  They were not mentioned in the article. In regard to what conditions contrails form, the article made vague statements rather than state that according to NASA “Contrails only form at very high altitudes (usually above 8 kilometers) where the air is extremely cold (less than -40 degrees C).”     Matt Stewart wrote: “Condensation trails, or contrails, form when water vapour from hot jet exhausts clashes with cold air, producing a visible cirrus-like cloud. Depending on temperature, humidity and altitude, they can be visible for only seconds or minutes, or may linger for hours and spread out for kilometers….”  I explained to Stewart, the Dominion Post reporter that chemtrails were being seen in areas where the humidity level was too low for them to be condensation trails.  NASA, NOAA and other scientific cloud-gazers agree that a relative humidity of 70% or higher is necessary for cloud and contrail formation. If the air is very dry, contrails do not form behind airplanes.   I referred Matt Stewart to top aerosol researcher, Clifford Carnicom’s findings in regard to this.  I sent him a link to an article where it stated:  [T]op aerosol investigator, Clifford Carnicom of the Carnicom Institute made some observations using atmospheric readings by NASA’s Climate Diagnostics Center related to 21 days of heavy “chemtrail” gridding over Santa Fe from January 1999 to August 1999. At altitudes where persistent white trails criss-crossed the typically cloudless New Mexico sky, Carnicom found 30% humidity or less, proving that the trails were not “contrails.”  There was no mention in the article that this was occurring and provided solid evidence to prove that chemtrails were real. I advised him that the Kiwi Kids Cloud Identification Guide (2009) showed a photo of chemtrails sprayed in parallel and referred to them as “cirrostratus clouds.” I sent him a link via email to the article related to this, which shows the photo to enable him to verify this and mentioned that the booklet was put together by the Ministry of Education, the Royal Society and NASA.  Stewart took it upon himself to take my statement completely out of context and wrote:  “Everyone from Air New Zealand and the Ministry of Education to agritech giant Monsanto and the National Aeronautics Space Administration are implicated in the conspiracy, and no amount of evidence from MetService which she labels a disinformation service”, can not convince her otherwise.” It is interesting that he writes that “no amount of evidence from MetService…” when I have not referred to MetService for evidence.  They provide none, merely statements from talking heads who attempt to cover up the fact that stratospheric aerosol geoengineering is occurring. Also, Matt Stewart’s article misleadingly claims that Wellington meteorologist Ross Marsden of MetService became a ‘‘target of unwanted attention’’ from the chemtrail lobby. (See below).  This is the complete reverse of what occurred and others who use this website can confirm this.   When I started the Northland NZ Chemtrails Watch website, Ross Marsden left comment after comment on the site, and in the end, I had to ask him to desist, as I got fed up with him claiming that aerosol trails were condensation trails.  It was unwanted disinformation, just as Matt Stewart’s sorry excuse for an article is. ???????????????????????????????????? Related: Alex Jones of talks about how the public is being brainwashed. 

Matt Stewart  Matt Stewart Dominion Post Matt Stewart  Matt Stewart Dominion Post Matt Stewart  Matt Stewart Dominion Post Matt Stewart  Matt Stewart Dominion Post Matt Stewart  Matt Stewart Dominion Post Matt Stewart  Matt Stewart Dominion Post

About Clare Swinney

Interested in what is genuinely going on, not in the disinformation promoted as "truth" by the corrupt mainstream media. Please keep an open mind and do your own research. M.Sc. (Hons) from Auckland University. If you came to this site via the 'Silly Beliefs' disinformation website, please read my response to their article at the link:
This entry was posted in Disinformation, Media, Poisoning Environment, Propaganda and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Dominion Post Runs Propaganda Piece Concealing Scientific Evidence Which Proves Aerosol Geoengineering Is Occurring

  1. Jim Reece says:

    Was the journalist lazy or deliberately covering up the mountain of evidence that shows this is real? My guess is covering up the truth. There is a pattern of this in the mainstream media. Propaganda remains a prime method for controlling thoughts and views.

    • Anthony says:

      Agree. Where’s the investigative journalism that is so desperately needed? The only comfort I take in this is that the attitude displayed in Stewart’s article is reminiscent of that displayed when fracking first came to the public’s attention – it was considered wacky then. And this is one of the first times I myself have seen something on chemtrails in the mainstream media – I just wish it was more investigative than patsy!

  2. Sarah says:

    Good work Clare. Are the newspapers being told to do these articles now?! The spraying of aerosols has been particularly heavy over much of the rest of world this last month, and a lot more attention is being drawn to it. It shows that this has been noticed and could be seen as a useful reaction. So take heart, the message is getting out now! A big river begins from tiny streams.
    We have our water tests. They only take a small time to send anywhere we want and together they will make a lake of evidence.
    Letter to the editor:
    Are we ready to initiate a worldwide petition with Avaaz?

    • Thank-you Sarah. A few papers have run this kind of piece recently, haven’t they. Perhaps it has been initiated by the phone calls they are receiving from concerned citizens who see the many aerosol trails and know they are not condensation trails, as they behave so differently, lingering and spreading out to cause a white haze in the sky.
      Here is radio show host, Alex Jones talking to a caller to about the brainwashing that is occurring in relation to chemtrails:

  3. Nik says:

    The ultimate goal of geo-engineering will be earth cataclysms and de-population. There are dooms-day seed bunkers, Green monuments to mass de-population (& rumoured underground base networks).

    The political methods that concentrate the power are the ones that squeeze out reason in the handling & approach to issues in political democracies, as they are blinded by pettiness & peoples of that nature.

  4. ROFL, you must be gutted Clare 🙂

  5. Rose of the excellent forum asked me to post this picture in the comment section: Marsden

  6. Annamae says:

    Good work Clare — the mainstream media is getting nervous that the truth is getting out there – so one way to discredit anyone from believing the truth (or jumping on the truth bandwagon) – is to spread disinfo intended to alienate anyone that may be questioning the status quo. After all, when you call someone a conspiracy theorist, it is meant to “shut the person up” or belittle them. Nowadays, I don’t get upset at all when someone says those words, because to me — conspiracy theorist equates with someone who ASKS questions, looks at the facts/information, and thinks for themselves — rather than being spoonfed what the idiotbox or mainstream media feeds them. Gee, critical thinkers questioning answers that do not make sense — how is this a bad thing? There are enough whistleblowers out there that can verify this IS happening — We need more people like you — who can make up their own minds, rather than a population of sheep that just believe what they are TOLD rather than dig for the information themselves.

  7. Danielle says:

    Well done Clare. Clearly Matt Stewart and anonymousatco don’t mind their loved ones gulping down copious volumes of strontium, aluminium and barium when they take a drink … strange…
    What also intrigues me … these defenders of the fiction are always on the defensive about these constant trails. I would really like to hear some coherent and logical explanations from them regarding why this huge expense criss crossing the planet daily, for what? We hear plenty from them about what’s not in the trails, but how about some rationale for why they are up there then?

    • Thank-you for your comment Danielle. It does surprise me how these people can go along with an agenda which is harming their own families also. But then, look what happened in Nazi Germany.
      Today the propaganda machine is so much more sophisticated, with thousands working in advertising agencies, public relations firms and programing departments of the TV networks and cable and satellite channels, worldwide, many under the command of corporate owners who are assiduously working to prevent the truth getting out to the public.

  8. Verna Taylor says:

    I think they want to acclimate the public to the idea of geoengineering. This is highly organized in such a way as to get the public to actually accept geongineering based on their planned timeline.All being done in phases or steps. As they have their international meetings and recuit individuals and ther countries to agree and help with financial backing as well as other countries.If the public pitches a fit to soon it compromises their recieving the financial support. Its all about control built in laws and writing executive orders in such a way that liabilty to those participating will not face any or very little liabilty so as not to be discouraged from backing the idea of geoengineering.But.. when they are ready after they believe enough people will support the idea, after they get things in place they will blatently say,”We are here to save the day! The very people that are already putting out their propagand crap,even playing the good cop bad cop trick in their reporting on the “subscale field trials experimence”.They are already spraying and its more than just a ” little test” in the field. They have bee spraying nanoparticulates of reflective particles,blocking the sun with this artifcial solar covering.If this is just their little field test…I dread seeing the fullblown project in play. Verna

  9. Tony says:

    All truth passes through three stages. First it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. That hit-piece shows we’re just in the first stage. Matt Stewart has done his fellow humans, and indeed all life on this planet a huge disfavour.

  10. Peter Woodhall says:

    Very well done, Clare.
    I know chemtrails are being sprayed worldwide. From a Christchurch perspective, I see these damn chemtrails over Christchurch all the time and have taken hundreds of photographs, and videoed them. I have noted recently in this month of May that they have been dropping them here at a higher altitude, but still they hang around for ages and spread out. The normal drops here, I have noted are around 10- to 20,000 feet, in the domestic airline flight-path zone. Nowhere near the height of 8 kilometres or 5 miles. That is in the International airline flight-path zone. Far too low to be called con trails, the air doesn’t freeze at 10 to 20,000 feet. They are scared of the truth being revealed, aren’t they? It is easy to blame something else for this, like everything the elite do, to cover up their tracks. I get the impression the reporter may have been quietly told to cool it.
    A really good example of them, chemtrails, and their uses, was the huge drop on Christchurch during the morning of Friday 23.12.2011, at low altitude, then at 2 in the afternoon they was a 5.9 magnitude Earthquake, followed exactly 80 minutes later by a bigger magnitude 6. I filmed and photographed it all.
    I mean why drop contrails at such a low height, where they don’t exist, but chemtrails definitely do.
    What a shame there are masses of cellphones, so people look down at the ground all the time, and not up in the sky.

  11. Thank-you to Kate, who sent this to the editor of the Dominion Post on May the 22nd, 2013.
    FW: Chemtrails?‏

    Hi Clare- this sent just now.


    Sent: Wednesday, 22 May 2013 9:03 p.m.
    To: ‘’
    Subject: Chemtrails?

    Dear Editor,
    I read Matt Stewart’s tousle-haired, crumpled pyjama-ed, school-yard-toady scoff piece on chemtrails, May 28, with something akin to exhaustion. Did this man do any research at all? This isn’t journalism, it’s outright two-hour-ago opinion. Could Stewart not even get the title right? It should have read “Chemtrails: an evil plot…”, no one has ever suggested that contrails were an evil plot, not even “persistent” ones. Stewart refers to people who have legitimate unanswered questions, as well as serious mounting evidence (start by googling the NZ Royal Society on stratospheric aerosol geo-engineering) as “believers” with barely concealed mirth. I am horrified at this adolescent ridicule of a legitimate global concern.

    Matt Stewart would probably have shown the same knee-jerk incredulity if someone were to have tried to explain to him twenty years ago that “they” were tampering with DNA and creating chimera from mixed species, that, in fact the first patent on a novel life form had already been granted back in 1986. Well hello Matt, put down your latte for a moment, grow some years and try to have the intelligence to set aside your limited conditioning for a day or two: do some proper research. Pretend you’re interested. You never know, you might end up uncovering that dreadful plot and becoming a legitimate reporter. Chemtrails are as real as weather derivatives, as weather manipulation and as genetically engineered crops. All it takes is a decent mind to look for the evidence not the spin.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s