Another Letter About Chemtrails In Northern Advocate

Betty Hooper

Betty Hooper

The inspirational ninety-three-year-old Betty Hooper of Hikurangi, Northland, posted this letter in to the Northern Advocate in reply to letters from Colin Edwards of Parua Bay, Whangarei, two weeks ago.  It was published in the August 8th, 2013 edition on page 8.  Betty was very pleased to learn that it had been published at last and says she is interested to see what comments it provokes from readers, if any, in the weeks to come.

Well done to Betty for this informative letter and thank-you to her for her unwavering commitment to exposing this issue in the public arena.

SCAN0126

 

This entry was posted in Activism. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Another Letter About Chemtrails In Northern Advocate

  1. Sarah says:

    The cover of Time magazine’s latest issue will feature the bee colony collapse. I wonder how much information it will contain about geoengineering and chemtrails?
    Einstein gave the human race four years if we lost the bees.

    • Thanks Sarah. Albert Einstein said: “If the bee disappears from the surface of the earth, man would have no more than four years to live. No more bees, no more pollination … no more men!”

      I wonder if Time magazine will mention the impact radiation from our communication systems is having on the bees also, which is referred to in this documentary:
      Resonance: Beings of Frequency
      http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/resonance-beings-frequency/

      It shows that bees completely abandon a hive that is fitted with a Dect phone.

  2. Jazzaconda says:

    Clare, I’m just wondering if you can actually put your research skills to good use? I.e showing the difference between Contrails vs Chemtrails? Saying that contrails dissipate with seconds to minutes (as your only source between the two, is very poor research I have too say). We are talking Science here, Have you ever heard of a ‘Control’? Research how to Research, otherwise your just a female Alex Jones. Nobody wants that, do they?

    • Here are two examples that show a contrail in the same photo as chemtrails. As you can see there is a vast difference between the two: https://chemtrailsnorthnz.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/pkcontrail-vs-chemtrails.jpg
      https://chemtrailsnorthnz.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/pk-diff-between-contrails-and-chemtrails.jpg

      While strictly speaking it was not valid for Betty to state that contrails only last for 20 seconds, it IS valid to state that science is based upon observation and people have witnessed contrails dissipating within a short time for decades, while in contrast aerosol trails are being seen lingering, sometimes for two hours or more.

      Chemtrails linger, sometimes for hours and can spread out to form cloud-like material. Condensation trails from jet aircraft normally fade away within a minute.

      Plus, there are other means by which one can distinguish chemtrails from ‘contrails’ or condensation trails, including that a proportion of the chemtrails have undulations at regular intervals along the bottom edge, suggesting that pumps are being used to eject the particulate matter. Here are excellent examples of such undulations in photos shot in Stratford, Taranaki in March 2010.
      https://chemtrailsnorthnz.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/eyewitness-chemtrail-report-stratford-is-getting-hit-hard/

      Furthermore, some planes have aerosol delivery devices along a large portion of the trailing edge of the wings, making it an impossibility for their wide trails to be mere condensation trails. See an example of this here. Note also that the trail stops and starts indicating an aerosol delivery device is being turned off and on.

      Aerosol trails are being seen in areas where the humidity level is too low for them to be contrails. NASA and NOAA agree a relative humidity of 70% or higher is required for contrail formation. If the air is very dry, contrails do not form behind jets. See Carnicominstiture.org

      Rainwater test results in New Zealand indicate that aluminium, barium and strontium are being sprayed via aerosol delivery devices, and research by Matthias Hancke’s group overseas, where samples from trails taken in flight were analysed, has confirmed the presence of these elements. More: http://globalskywatch.com/live/archive/2013-06-10,Matthias-Hancke.html#.Ubl2Fucwe-l

      Refer the 300-page report, CASE ORANGE for more.

      Jazzaconda, what does the use of an experimental control have to do with the contents of Betty Hooper’s letter? I have scratched my head and am at a loss to know. Please explain.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s