On Friday, November the 29th, Sean Plunket, who hosts the 9am – midday slot on Radio Live’s talkback show, asked listeners to phone in regarding “chemtrails,” in response to the Conservative Party’s, Colin Craig saying that he would not dismiss their existence.
Throughout the show, which included a call to Colin Craig, Plunket evinced a lack of interest in delving into the issue rationally and exposed that he knew virtually zilch, referring to it as a “nutty Internet conspiracy” and to those who knew about it as “nutters.”
A variety of reasonably well-informed people phoned in – and a mish-mash of the poorly-informed. Hardly impartial to the subject matter, Plunket, a polarizing figure, like Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly, seemed to be encouraging callers to deny chemtrails’ existence and on occasion exhibited disappointment when people dared to admit that they believed chemtrails were a real. Not surprisingly, those who were convinced that the trails they saw lingering were merely vapour trails were treated with approval. The fact that trails have been witnessed where the relative humidity is well below the 70%+ NASA state is required for vapour trails to exist was not mentioned.
In spite of Plunket’s closed-minded and condemnatory attitude towards the subject matter and “the chemtrail believers,” snippets of valid information did manage to make it onto the airwaves, including that aluminium was being sprayed and that the aerosols were causing health problems. As far as I know, one of the most important facts was not mentioned. While it was suggested that the aerosol trails were being sprayed in order to directly effect the population in some way, (as the UK Guardian revealed was done by the government in the UK), the fact that the vast majority of aerosols are being used for weather modification purposes, was not mentioned.
I tried to call in to the show five times to address this matter, but only got a busy signal. It may have been because I used the same line as Jim Reece, who phoned in to tell Sean Plunket he should do some research. I did send him an email with information about chemtrails, but, not surprisingly, this wasn’t read out on air.
All-in-all Plunket’s show was misleading, an insult to people’s intelligence and his repeated unwarranted use of the word “nutters,” utterly disgraceful. (Incidentally, listening to this show made an activist in North Canterbury literally throw up!) Consequently, I submitted a formal complaint to the broadcaster via the Broadcasting Standards Authority (BSA) website on November the 30th, on grounds that the show presented inaccurate information, and that it was denigrating.
In response to the statement on the BSA site: ‘If the standards committee upholds my complaint I would like the following as a remedy for the breach of broadcast standards,’ I replied: ‘I would like Mr Plunket to apologise for referring to those who know about chemtrails as nutters and advise the public during a radio show in the near future that he has since established that chemtrails are real.’
This is my complaint in full. I encourage others who were similarly offended by his show to write to the broadcaster also:
I wish to make a formal complaint regarding the RadioLive talkback show Sean Plunket hosted on the issue of “chemtrails” on November the 29th, 2013.
Firstly, I will address the matter of accuracy, as it was evident Mr Plunket had no idea what he was talking about, as he indicated to his audience repeatedly during the show that chemtrails were not real.
1. COMPLAINT MADE ON THE GROUNDS THAT SEAN PLUNKET PROVIDED INFORMATION THAT WAS INACCURATE AND FALSE
I hereby present information, which is on the public record, which proves that “chemtrails,” which are also known as ‘aerosols’ and ‘persistent contrails,’ are real.
A good example which proves that “chemtrails” are real and sprayed on unwitting populations by governments comes from declassified documents, the contents of which were reported by the BBC, ITV and the UK Guardian. RadioLive can find these online.
It was revealed that for years the UK’s Ministry of Defence sprayed millions of UK citizens from planes, disseminating huge amounts of zinc cadmium sulphide into their atmosphere. The BBC program, Inside Out, aired a program on 6th November, 2006 on this topic and showed that scientists from Porton Down had used the UK as a vast outdoor laboratory. From 1950 to the late-1970s, Porton Down scientists had clandestinely sprayed zinc cadmium sulphide over populated areas of the UK, in spite of the fact that cadmium was known to be dangerous to human health. See ‘Cadmium Poisoning’ at Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadmium_poisoning
The zinc cadmium sulphide trials had previously been exposed in the April 2002 UK Guardian article, Millions were in germ war tests. Refer: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2002/apr/21/uk.medicalscience Also, broadcast by ITV West in late 2004, the documentary, ‘Top Secrets Revealed’ had in Part 1 exposed zinc cadmium sulphide was sprayed over an unwitting public in parts of the UK. Refer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ydm8rgF18I&feature=gv
This is particularly important evidence for it proves that unwitting citizens were sprayed with a harmful compound by governments on a large scale, yet this was concealed from the public for decades. This demonstrates that chemtrails being used to negatively effect peoples’ health is not a wild conspiracy theory as Mr Plunket would have his audience believe.
Plus, chemtrails were used by the U.S. Air Force during the Vietnam War to induce rain along the Ho Chi Minh Trail. This rainmaking story was on the front page of the New York Times in 1972 and on TV on the History Channel.
The IPCC & Geoengineering
One of the those who called into the show, Jim Reece, referred to the fact that the IPCC (in its fifth assessment) refers to geoengineering. Geoengineering includes the spraying of chemtrails, which is officially called Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering. Refer 7-4 of the report: http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/uploads/WGIAR5_WGI-12Doc2b_FinalDraft_Chapter07.pdf While this report states that this technology has not been implemented or tested to combat so-called climate change, evidence from around the globe suggests strongly otherwise.
The fact that the IPCC is discussing using this technology is cause for concern and it provides evidence to show that chemtrails are real.
Furthermore, some politicians overseas have spoken out about chemtrails. Rep. Congressman Dennis Kucinich introduced the Space Preservation Act of 2001 – HR 2977, which called for the elimination of ‘exotic weaponry’ from space, including weather-modifying weapons such as ‘chemtrails.’ While this Act was amended and the term ‘chemtrails’ removed, the original which shows this technology exists remains on the Congressional Record.
Also, a Swedish Green Party politician called Pernilla Hagberg said chemtrails were real and toxic in late-October last year and a former Premier of British Columbia, Bill Vander Zalm, is currently educating people about chemtrails/geoengineering and has asked municipalities to pass a resolution that if there is any program related to climate change, and if anything is sprayed in the air, it is done with public consent.
Award-winning TV weatherman, Scott Stevens, who has the website Weatherwars.Info, is believed to have been the first civilian to discover the primary use for the large masses of chemtrails being seen globally. He states that they are used for weather engineering purposes and he explains how they are used on his website.
The history of interest in weather-related technologies, including chemtrails, is evident when a list of related patents is examined. Pertinently, the Stratospheric Welsbach patent refers to the use of particles of the oxides of metals, including aluminium oxide in the stratosphere for the stated goal of reducing global warming, while the HAARP patent, devised in part for modifying the weather, states that barium be put into the atmosphere. Aluminium and barium have been found in New Zealand rainwater repeatedly over recent years and one can view the lab results on the Northland NZ Chemtrails Watch website.
During the droughts in Northland in 2010 and 2013, as well as lab analyses confirming the presence of aluminium and barium in the rainwater in Whangarei, Northland, I and others who live locally, photographed masses of aerosols in the sky that lingered and were seen to form a white haze in the sky. Pertinently, top geoengineers admit a known consequence of saturating the atmosphere with particulates is drought, because when there are too many condensation nuclei in the air, the moisture can not form into droplets big enough to fall as rain. Please refer: Geoengineering Causing Drought And Fueling Fires July 5, 2013, http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/geoengineering-robbing-rain-and-fueling-fires/
A woman phoned in near the end of the show and told Mr Plunket he should be more open-minded. He replied, amongst other things, that she should not believe in chemtrails. I think it was highly inappropriate for him to tell a caller what she should think, given that he had done little or no research on the topic.
2. COMPLAINT MADE ON GROUNDS THAT SEAN PLUNKET USED DENIGRATING REMARKS
During his radio show on the morning of November the 29th, 2013, Mr Plunket could not hold an informed discussion on the topic of chemtrails and resorted to name calling. He smeared the reputations of those who know and speak openly about chemtrail/aerosol technology by stating repeatedly that those who believed in chemtrails were “nutters.”
I personally found being called a nutter insulting, hurtful and denigrating and believe that this kind of tactic is uncalled for in a civilized society, particularly on a popular talk show such as this, which influences public opinion.
Myself and other anti-geoengineering activists, who are educating the public about this technology, already find it hard enough getting some members of the public to open their minds and consider that the lingering trails sprayed by aircraft which spread out and create a milky haze in the sky, are something other than vapour trails. Needless to state, radio shows which encourage condemnation of those who are well-informed, do not help.
I would appreciate your attention to the contents herein.