Time Magazine Goes Both Ways On The Polar Vortex

StevenGoddard.wordpress.com Posted on January 7, 2014

In 1974, Time Magazine blamed the cold polar vortex on global cooling.

Scientists have found other indications of global cooling. For one thing there has been a noticeable expansion of the great belt of dry, high-altitude polar winds —the so-called circumpolar vortex—that sweep from west to east around the top and bottom of the world.

Another Ice Age? – TIME

Forty years later, Time Magazine blames the cold polar vortex on global warming

But not only does the cold spell not disprove climate change, it may well be that global warming could be making the occasional bout of extreme cold weather in the U.S. even more likely. Right now much of the U.S. is in the grip of a polar vortex, which is pretty much what it sounds like: a whirlwind of extremely cold, extremely dense air that forms near the poles. Usually the fast winds in the vortex—which can top 100 mph (161 k/h)—keep that cold air locked up in the Arctic. But when the winds weaken, the vortex can begin to wobble like a drunk on his fourth martini, and the Arctic air can escape and spill southward, bringing Arctic weather with it. In this case, nearly the entire polar vortex has tumbled southward, leading to record-breaking cold

More: http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/01/07/time-magazine-goes-both-ways-on-the-polar-vortex/

This entry was posted in Global Warming Hoax. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Time Magazine Goes Both Ways On The Polar Vortex

  1. Maddie says:

    I never heard of a polar vortex until the last week. It was always El Nina/El Nina influenced blizzards.

  2. Maddie says:

    Sorry. El Nino/ La Ninas. And I am 62 years old so I’ve been around for a lot of weather. They didn’t call the winter storms we had during 1977 to 1978 polar vortex caused. Or 1994’s winter either.

  3. Tom Petrie says:

    Apparently, not ONE major weather reporter in America knows how to use Google. Imagine that! If they had, they could easily see that this so-called “Polar Vortex” is in all likelihood, an engineered phenomena. It’s not like Geoengineering or HAARP, are new AND it’s not difficult to see chemtrails all over. I even had a neighbor with the foresight to measure snow for aluminum at a local lab and it came back extremely high in Aluminum. Well, like any reporter, can’t find what you’re not looking for and the public can’t learn about subjects (e.g., Chemtrails, weather modification, etc.) if the newspapers or television don’t “help them.” (The average consumer doesn’t have the energy to walk 1 mile per day–how will they research stuff that the media never discusses?) From the environmental reporters on the West Coast who can’t seem to utter the word Fukushima EVER, to the weather and news reporters in the central and eastern United States who NEVER mention Chemtrails, Geoengineering or HAARP, I have only one question: “Why can’t you Google these terms and become more than script readers and entertainers for the idiotic masses? It’s not like you’ve never heard about these, is it? If this is true, you ought to be ashamed of yourself. Need links? Start Googling phrases like Fukushima, HAARP, Chemtrails, Geoengineering, etc. Don’t ask me to repeat myself, as I’m staring to sound pedantic now…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s