Atmospheric Aerosol Researcher Asked To Destroy Document Sent In Error By The Ministry For The Environment

An internal memorandum was sent in error by an employee at the Ministry for the Environment to a post-graduate researcher named Malcolm Scott of Canterbury.  Mr Scott, who is investigating issues related to atmospheric aerosol operations in New Zealand, did not realize the significance of the 6-paged document until someone called him and asked him to destroy it.


Post-graduate researcher,   Mr Malcolm Scott

On March the 11th, Mr Scott got a phone call  from a member of the Climate Directorate staff informing him that a 6-page memo had been sent in error and they wanted it destroyed.  Malcolm asked for the request in writing and lo and behold, later that afternoon this arrived via email:

Can you please confirm by return that you have destroyed the 6 page internal memorandum that was inadvertently released to you under the Official information (OIA).  A mistake at our end and I apologise for that.

The request came as a surprise, as he had assumed the internal memo was part of the material sent in response to his questions, which included the letter posted below and dated February the 29th, 2016.   However, on examining the internal memo in more detail, he understood why the Ministry for the Environment did not want him to keep it.

Titled ‘Malcolm Scott 16-D-00142′  and dated February the 24th, 2016, the internal memo is written in relation to questions Mr Scott had submitted to the Ministry under the Official Information Act, (OIA) on February the 8th, 2016, regarding atmospheric aerosol operations.

While he is unable to allow it to be published yet, it has been cited for this article.

Under the heading ‘Risks’ the memo mentions that their response to Mr Scott is considered to be “low risk”  as: “There is not much material in scope and what is released is only a list of dates.” 

It also refers to the perceived risk in relation to the media, indicating that keeping atmospheric aerosol operations out of the public’s consciousness is important to the government.  It states: “Correspondents often make multiple requests, but all enquiries have proved to be low risk, attracting little if any public or media attention.”  

Springer1Mr Scott offers: “There are repeated references to risk assessment of release of information, and it is apparent that staff are actively monitoring public and media attention to reports of aerosol forcing operations.  This seems unusual given that Ministry officials have repeatedly denied any awareness of aerosol forcing operations and repeatedly claimed that there’s no evidence of these operations in New Zealand.”

Needless to state the internal memo provides important insights into the Ministry for the Environment’s policies related to OIA requests regarding aerosols operations.  It strongly suggests that there is a directive to deny that atmospheric aerosol operations are taking place, thereby indicating that those in power do not respect the public’s right to know the facts when the Official Information Act is applied.

When Mr Scott received the request to destroy the internal memo, we consulted with a number of people to find out what his options were, as he believes the public has a right to see it.   Investigative journalist and government watchdog, Nicky Hagar, who wrote Secret Power and Dirty Politics advised:  “Malcolm has no obligation at all to destroy that memo. They slipped up and sent an internal document. They addressed it to him and sent it. It’s their problem. He would probably be entitled to be sent the same document if he applied for it under the Privacy Act anyway…”

In a letter dated April the 5th, Mr Scott requested the memo under the Privacy Act  on the basis that it is related to his research inquiries and bears significant reference to information about himself.     “I also advised Ministry officials and staff that they have a responsibility to act in the public good, to uphold existing environmental legislation and work with other governmental authorities to ensure legislation which protects the environment is enforced,” he offered.  He is waiting for their reply.

Mr Scott, who is very concerned about this issue, said he believes the time is overdue for the Ministry for the Environment to step up to their responsibilities in relation to the aerosol spraying operations underway in New Zealand and demonstrate the environmental stewardship and leadership the public expects.

Democracy is being undermined as access to information is being denied.  Reform of the Ministry’s policies is imperative in order to protect the environment and the health of humans and other species.  This is far more important than maintaining secrecy.   The facts regarding atmospheric aerosol operations must be released.

Below: A slideshow showing some evidence of atmospheric aerosol operations both here in New Zealand and overseas.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Below: Letter from the Ministry for the Environment, answering Malcolm Scott’s questions in a typically guarded manner.  MalcolmOIA reply12MalcolmOIA reply2MalcolmOIA reply3

Related: Pdf version of letter dated Feb 29th, 2016, sent in reply to Malcolm Scott in reply to his questions submitted under the OIA.

Pdf version of the letter to the Ministry for the Environment from Mr Scott dated April the 5th, 2016

  1. CFR on Planetary Geoengineering: “Add more small reflecting particles in the upper part of the atmosphere”
  2. The Government Is Already “Geo-Engineering” The Environment
  3. Geoengineering Conference To Discuss Blocking Sun
  4. Colossal GeoEngineering in Plain Sight
  5. Rosalind Peterson: The Chemtrail Cover-Up
  6. Scientists to Create “Artificial Volcano” In Bid to Geoengineer Climate
  7. Scientists Admit Climate Cooled in the Last Decade, Cite Sulfur Pollution from China
  8. Rosalind Peterson: The Chemtrail Cover-Up
  9. U.S. Government Mad Scientists Geo-Engineer Atmosphere
  10. Scientists Admit Chemtrails Are Creating Artificial Clouds
  11. Geoengineering Unmonitored
  12. Concerns About Chemtrails Given Fresh Impetus

13. Why In The World Are They Spraying?

14. Evidence of Weather Modification Technology In Use In Canterbury Shown on TVNZ One Weather 29 July, 2013

15. Welsbach Patent for Atmospheric Seeding With Heavy  Metals

16. Neurologist Warms Aluminum in Chemtrails is a Dangerous Neurotoxin

17. Frances Mangels Talks To John Whyte About Geoengineering:


19. Chemtrail PsyOps: NBC News Reports Jet “Contrails” Change Our Weather For the “Better”

20. As weatherman, Scott Stevens, who has examined the use of chemtrails using time-lapse equipment has noted however, SRM is a very poor explanation for the chemtrail program, as there is something far deeper, more complex and important than simply “making clouds to keep out sunshine” from an already cooling planet going on.

About Clare Swinney

Interested in what is genuinely going on, not in the disinformation promoted as "truth" by the corrupt mainstream media. Please keep an open mind and do your own research. M.Sc. (Hons) from Auckland University. If you came to this site via the 'Silly Beliefs' disinformation website, please read my response to their article at the link:
This entry was posted in Activism, Government, Politics and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Atmospheric Aerosol Researcher Asked To Destroy Document Sent In Error By The Ministry For The Environment

  1. South Canterbury Sky Watch says:

    Malcolm Scott bloody good job, Nicky Hagar bloody good job.
    What is written in this article is bloody good and the public deserve to know. These bastards who try and cover this game up, need to cut their puppet ties and think or their own family and the rest of the public.

  2. Great disclosure Clare, would love to see this on my facebook page and hope as many people as possible share this information . Catherine Ebard

  3. Mark Allen says:

    question – there have been many OIA requests to government regarding the activities in our skies, all of them came back saying that this was NOT happening in NZ – so would i be correct in assuming that these replies were lies? if so, what, if any, are the consequences of our officials deliberately giving false answers on OIA requests? people’s heads need to roll on this issue – what on earth is the point in OIA requests if they don’t play by their own fracking rules????

  4. Gavin says:

    Proves their insanity.

  5. The plea for this document’s destruction is one of the “smoking guns” of aerosol crimes that are besieging & plaguing our world at this time in history. I’m so very sorry to see that New Zealand is also being affected in this same way by the atmospheric scourge that I am seeing so often here, in California. I was fortunate to able to be able to experience the wonders of New Zealand’s blue, blue skies; contrasted against the country’s many green hills. The green, grassy hills were all dotted with many, many white sheep & other domestic ‘farm animals’ in New Zealand’s winter of 1972, when I was 18 & on a vacation with my family. Parts of New Zealand had such unusual trees, forests & glaciers. It was like a journey back in time to a ‘simpler age’. I’m afraid now that “the times” have caught up with this magical place.

  6. Robert Illes says:

    Great news in the right direction; ; ending life as we know it on Planet Earth ..

  7. Gavin says:

    Is insanity a requirement to work for the NZ Govt?

  8. Pingback: CANADA: 1st Lawsuit Filed Over Damage Caused by Geoengineering (chemtrails.) | OUR GREATER DESTINY

  9. Sarah says:

    If as they say it isn’t solar or weather control then what is all that deliberate pollution for? ….

    • Carnicom indicates in this post of March 19 2016 that the particulate matter in the concentrations being found can cull a percentage of the population.

      Pollution, Concentration and Mortality

      by Clifford E Carnicom
      Mar 19 2016

      A preliminary analytical model has been developed to estimate the impact of increased concentrations of atmospheric fine particulate pollution (PM 2.5) upon mortality rates. The model is a synthesis between an analysis of measured pollution levels (PM 2.5) and published increased mortality estimates. The model is based, in part, upon previous investigations as published in the paper “The Obscuration of Health Hazards : An Analysis of EPA Air Quality Standards“, Mar 2016.

      Models for both concentration levels and visibility have now been developed; for a related model in terms of visibility, please see the paper entitled Pollution, Visibility and Mortality, Mar 2016.
      Preliminary Concentration -Exposure – Mortality Model

      A substantial data base based upon direct field measurements of atmospheric fine particulate matter in the southwestern United States during the winter of 2015-2016 has been acquired. The measurements reveal clear relationships between the quality of air, the PM 2.5 concentration levels, visibility of the surrounding territory, and the existence or absence of airborne aerosol operations.

      The field data shows that repeated instances of the PM 2.5 count in the range between 30-60 ug/m3 is not unusual in combination with active atmospheric aerosol operations; visibility and health impacts are obvious under these conditions. The PM 2.5 count will inevitably be less than 10 (or even 5) ug/m3 under good quality air conditions.

      Additional studies based upon this acquired data may be conducted in the future. Numerous published studies make known relationships between small increases in PM 2.5 pollution and increased mortality.

      meter44Measured PM 2.5 Count, 44 ug/m3.

      As an example of use of this model, if the PM 2.5 count is 44 ug/m3 as shown in the above example, and if the number of days of exposure of this level is approximately 50, then the estimated increase in annual mortality is approximately 17%. This is an extreme increase in mortality, but under observed conditions in various locales it is not beyond the range of consideration. It is thought that reasonably conservative approaches have been adopted within the modeling process.

      The field data that has been collected and this model further highlight the serious deficiencies in the current Air Quality Index (AQI) as in current use by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In light of the current understanding of the health impacts of small changes in PM 2.5 counts (e.g, 10 ug/m3), a scale that gives equal prominence to values as high as 500 ug/m3 (catastrophic conditions) is an incredible disservice to the public. Please see the earlier referenced papers for a more thorough discussion of the schism between public health needs and the reporting systems that are in place.

      This researcher advocates the availability of direct and real-time fine particulate matter concentration levels (PM 2.5) to the public; this information should be as readily available as current weather data is. Cost and technology are no longer major barriers to this goal.

      operation-01Active Aerosol Operation
      City of Rocks, Southern N.M.

      operation-02Demonstration of the Impact of Aerosol Banks Upon Visibility.
      Concentration Levels and Subsequent Visibility Changes
      Directly Impact Mortality.

      As an incidental note, it may be recalled from earlier work that there is a strong conceptual basis for the development and application of surveillance systems that are dependent upon atmospheric aerosol concentrations. This application is only one of many that have been proposed over a period of many years, and readers may refer to additional details on this subject within the research library. Documentaries produced by this researcher (Aerosol Crimes, Cloud Cover) during the last decade also elaborate on those analyses. The principles of LIDAR apply here.

      Current field observations continue to reinforce this hypothesis. Observation in the southwest U.S. indicates that two locale types appear to be preferred targets for application: these include the large urban areas and the border region between the U.S. and Mexico. These locations, considered in a joint sense, suggest that both people and the monitoring or tracking of those same people within an area may be a technical and strategic priority of the project. A citizen based systematic and sustained nationwide monitoring system of PM 2.5 concentrations over a sufficient time period can clarify this issue further.

      The recent papers on the subject of air quality are intended to raise the awareness and involvement of the public with respect to environmental and health conditions. There are very real relationships between how far you can see, the concentration levels of particulates in the atmosphere, and ultimately our mortality. It is our responsibility as stewards, as well as in our own best interest, to not deliberately and wantonly contaminate the planet.

      Clifford E Carnicom
      Mar 19, 2016

      • Baza says:

        The graph says it all – an expected mortality rate increase of 36%. It is part of the eugenics agenda hiding in plain sight.
        Add up the deaths & wasted lives. From the vaccines giving immunity scam, to fluoride in drinking water supposedly safe & effective in reducing tooth decay, to pesticides, glyphosate & gmos endocrine disrupting their way across the landscape that has been aerially splattered with 1080 everywhere.
        One has to wonder to what purpose in NZ?
        Will NZ indeed be godzone in the near future when the rest of the planet is earthquaked or nuked to a pile of rubble or underwater? What better way to ensure “sustainable land area” for the elite of the world who are being enabled by an ex derivatives banker & his blue tie suit criminal gang.

  10. Sarah says:

    Thank you Clare for the Carnicom post. It is hard for people to realise that our governments really do not care, that it is all spin , hype , misinformation and misdirection and it involves nearly all aspects of our lives. I have actually felt a lot better since acknowledged this, more energy to just get on with raising awareness the best I can.
    I do want to RISK seeing those six pages as soon as possible,

    • Malcolm advised that on the 15th of April, the Ministry for the Environment informed him that they have retracted their request for him to destroy the memo, so he will be making this public in due course.

  11. Pingback: CANADA: Class Action Filed Over Damage Caused by Geoengineering (chemtrails.) | OUR GREATER DESTINY

  12. Rahui says:

    It is interesting to read about the response of government officials. It is without question that the information held by the government is difficult to access, fought with commercial relationships which undermine the transparency of government processes. as they say know such thing as a fishing trip these days. the ombudsman struggles to keep up the OIA and fails in many respects to allow the information to flow, if it is not articulated in specific.

  13. george javan says:

    Look at the bottom of page 3. Nasa is saying that jet engine exhaust “induced cirrus cloudiness” causes 0.08 watts per square meter of global warming.
    This is verification that chemtrails HEAT the planet!–final.pdf

  14. Sarah says:

    Getting a not found on the above. So obviously again important info not for the likes of us.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s