From Ngaire Small of Nelson, New Zealand.
I had rainwater that fell in Nelson on November the 18th, 2013, tested by R J Hill Laboratories Ltd of Hamilton. There had been consistent heavy aerosol spraying apparent for approximately 10 days prior to that date.
The rainwater was tested for three elements known to be linked to geoengineering globally, namely: aluminium, strontium and barium, all of which were found in my sample. These elements have been found in hair and other rainwater samples from New Zealand before.
Related:
NORTHLAND NEW ZEALAND CHEMTRAILS WATCH 
First of all, let’s look at the test, and what the units of measurements mean….
The test posts results in g/m3 (grams per cubic meter)….which is the same thing as mg/L….(micrograms per litre) ….so either unit of measurement is equal to the same numeric value.
New Zealand drinking water quality standards 2005/08, lists aluminum GV (Guideline Value) for drinking water as 0.10 mg/L.
(This unit of measure is the exact same as 0.10 g/m3)
Now, after 10 days of “heavy spraying”, the lab rainwater test results for aluminum are: 0.0073 g/m3 (mg/L).
That is a 173 % less than New Zealand’s drinking water level GV standards (what might come out of the tap).
Let’s look at Barium in the lab results…
0.0084 g/m3 (mg/L)
The standard MAV (maximum acceptable value) for Barium is 0.7 g/m3 (mg/L)
The lab tests show the barium is at an extremely low level, 195% below MAV.
Also look at the lab result column, labeled “default detection limit”. This is the lab’s lowest limit that it can measure, using it’s equipment.
Aluminum….0.0032
Barium…..0.0001
(g/m3 (mg/L)
Please call the lab to verify what I am saying, and if they in any way feel that these test results are abnormal, or above normal.
Click to access drinking-water-standards-2008.pdf
As the post indicates this is related to establishing whether or not chemicals known to be used for geoengineering purposes were present in the rain.
These chemicals can accumulate in the body. This family drinks local rain water. Look at what is showing up in the hair sample. Refer: https://chemtrailsnorthnz.wordpress.com/2013/01/20/hair-analyses-of-northland-nz-resident-show-aluminium-barium-strontium-levels-increased-over-time/
According to Dr Russell Blaylock chemtrail chemicals are neurotoxic and will lead to an increased incidences of Alzheimers disease. Refer: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/what-chemtrails-are-doing-to-your-brain-dr-russell-blaylock/
If it is in the rain – it is in the air and we are breathing it also.
Do these drinking water standards refer to nano-sized particles? Nano-sized is what is being sprayed.
Another point – these chemicals accumulate in the soil and are poisoning environments. This does not come from me, it comes from a qualified soil biologist, who worked for the USDA and he has been studying the changes in soil over time. Refer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8X10W8i3myI
Do you remember that email i sent Hill Labs years ago Clare? I ask them if they were testing for nano sized particles. They said the tests include ALL TYPES!
All those minerals are in the soil, wind erodes the soil, wind takes all these minerals/particle up in the air and they return with the rain. Yes we breath in lots of dirt all the time.
Also have a think about space dust(the stuff that makes planets) About 40,000 tonnes of this stuff falls to the ground each year. Lots would come down with the rain.
You completely misunderstood what I was stating, Raymond. I understand that Hills lab tests are able to establish that particles of various sizes, including nano-sized are present in samples, (which is presumably why they are finding the metals associated with geoengineering/chemtrails in rainwater sourced from around New Zealand.)
I was asking if the “Drinking Water Standards” which this commenter referred to included nano-sized particles, as nano-sized are far more harmful to the body than the naturally sourced kind, as their size allows them to pass around the body and through the blood-brain barrier with ease, hence the climb in Alzheimers disease – refer interviews with Dr Russell Blaylock on this issue.
You keep avoiding the fact that BRIGHT WHITE PARTICLES ARE BEING FOUND IN THE RAINWATER, THE SAME COLOUR AS THE AEROSOLS WE SEE BEING SPRAYED AND WHEN I COLLECTED RAIN IN MAY THIS YEAR THERE WAS A WHITE HAZE EVIDENT IN THE RAINWATER. THIS IS NOT NATURAL. THE SAMPLE WAS TESTED BY HILLS AND FOUND TO CONTAIN ALUMINIUM, BARIUM AND STRONTIUM.
ALSO, IN THE VIDEO I SHOT ON MAY 7th, 2013 FROM WHANGAREI, IT IS POSSIBLE TO SEE THE PARTICLES FLOATING IN THE AIR. IT WAS NOT DIRT. THERE WAS A WHITE HAZE IN THE AIR. SEE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=kkuko114EFo AS YOU SEEM SO KNOWING, EXPLAIN WHAT THE WHITE SPHERICAL OBJECTS ARE.
Surely, by definition, if the particles are nano-sized, you would not be able to see them?
As I mentioned in my reply to Raymond today, nanosized particles can coagulate to form visible particles. To quote Wikipedia: “Existing aerosol particles or droplets also run into each other, creating larger particles or droplets in a process known as coagulation.” Please refer: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratospheric_sulfate_aerosols_%28geoengineering%29
The coagulation rate of particles used in aerosols is naturally of particular concern to geoengineers. For example, Prof. David Keith, who is recognized as one of the world’s top geoengineers, referred to the coagulation rate of alumina when he compares it to the properties of sulphur in a presentation he gave at the AAAS meeting in San Diego February 20th, 2010. He states, quote – alumina has 16 times less the coagulation rate. Listen here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qrquFx5uV_E
More:
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/geoengineer-david-keith-using-aluminum-over-10-megatons-per-year-instead-of-sulfur/
How big do you think a nano particle is Clare and do you think you could see one? Have you looked into how small even a 100nm wide particle is?
Please get back to me if you think you can see a nano particle with your eyes. This may make you reconsider what you think you have see in the water, what were those white specs really? nano particles i think not. If they were aluminum they i would have expected a MUCH higher aluminum result but this wasn’t the case.
You said “You keep avoiding the fact that BRIGHT WHITE PARTICLES ARE BEING FOUND IN THE RAINWATER”
A nano particle is a particle that is between 1 – 100nm.
120 nm — diameter of a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
Could you see HIV with your eyes Clare.
Have a very slow think about what you and you internet friends are saying and thinking.
Raymond, thank-you for your queries.
How big do I think a nanosized particle is? Extremely small. Too small to see with the naked eye. According to Wikipedia: In nanotechnology, a particle is defined as a small object that behaves as a whole unit with respect to its transport and properties. Particles are further classified according to diameter.[1] Coarse particles cover a range between 2,500 and 10,000 nanometers. Fine particles are sized between 100 and 2,500 nanometers.
However, nanosized particles coagulate to form visible particles. To quote Wikipedia: “Existing aerosol particles or droplets also run into each other, creating larger particles or droplets in a process known as coagulation.” Please refer: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratospheric_sulfate_aerosols_%28geoengineering%29
The lab test from Hills, in my opinion confirmed the presence of known aerosol particles in the rainwater.
As mentioned Raymond one of the reasons I mention that evidence shows the particles sprayed are nanosized is owing to their impact on health. To quote Dr Russell Blaylock, MD:
Refer full article with references here: http://ymlp.com/zWe1Ek
So if nano-sized particles are coagulating to form larger (so large as to be visible) particles, then they are no longer nano-sized.
The larger coagulated particles are presumably not as as dangerous, as their size does not allow them to pass around the body and through the blood-brain barrier.
Unless there’s some process that breaks down the coagulated aluminium inside the body. And if this is the case, why does the same process not affect aluminium entering the body via other pathways (e.g. drinking water, food)?
A question related to your point is what percentage of the aerosol particulates being disseminated into our atmosphere coagulate.
What is particularly concerning given this poison being put into our atmosphere is what this study Dr Blaylock has referenced shows – a study by Perl DP and Good PF, titled: “Aluminum, Alzheimer’s Disease, and the olfactory system,” in the Annals of NY Acad Sci 1991;640:8-13. It seems that the nano-sized particles can enter the brain readily through the olfactory system when we breathe and brains of Alzheimers sufferers have a concentration of aluminium in that part of the brain, which does not bode well for humanity, as Blaylock points out.
He states: the “intranasal route of exposure makes spraying of massive amounts of nanoaluminum into the skies especially hazardous, as it will be inhaled by people of all ages, including babies and small children for many hours… Because of the nanosizing of the aluminum particles being used, home-filtering systems will not remove the aluminum, thus prolonging exposure, even indoors.”
Please refer: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/neurologist-warns-aluminum-in-chemtrails-could-cause-explosive-increase-in-neurodegenerative-diseases-2/
Say a nano particle is 10^-9 metres across and thay you can see a 1 mm wide particle. Presumably a million plus nano-particles are ‘colagulating’ together. What is causing them to do this and why are there so many in the environment?
I suggest you direct your question regarding coagulation of aerosol particles to Harvard Prof. David Keith. http://www.keith.seas.harvard.edu/
Some months ago I found what appeared to be a white “particle” on a herb leaf in my garden when I went to collect fresh herbs for dinner. When I touched it it broke into a mass of powdery bright white particles that I believe may have formed into a clump as a result of coagulation. I wish now I had filmed it and sent the particles to Hills lab.
My name is Marie Snow and I live in Arizona… last week a military aircraft flew over my head and a web-like substance fell in long strands… we have pictures of the substance and two samples were sent to different labs..we have the attention of authorities and I am looking for anyone that has rain, blood, air, fiber samples positive for Aluminum, Barium, Strontium… I am collecting them from all over the world… please email me cvsnow@cableone.net
Thanks,
If you put “rainwater” in the search box on this website Marie, you will get a list of the rainwater analyses conducted around New Zealand in which aluminium, barium and strontium were found.