THE BEST ADVICE YOU CAN GIVE A CONSPIRACY THEORIST!
THE BEST ADVICE YOU CAN GIVE A CONSPIRACY THEORIST!
The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, also known as HAARP is to be transferred from military operation to “civillian control”, as the site is handed over to the University of Alaska, which will continue to use the mysterious facility for experiments.
“The Air Force Research Lab has control of the HAARP facility until Aug. 11,” Marmian Grimes, a university of Alaska spokesperson, wrote in an email to The Intercept.
“After that, the university will have access to the site under the terms of an agreement between [University of Alaska Fairbanks] and the Air Force. That agreement allows access for two years, which will provide the university and the Air Force time to negotiate an agreement regarding the transfer of the land.”
HAARP was officially constructed with the stated goal of studying the ionosphere. It is made up of a huge array of radio transmitters and antennas, which generate radio waves to heat up portions of the ionosphere, the region of Earth’s upper atmosphere, from about 60 km (37 mi) to 1,000 km (620 mi) altitude, which is ionized by solar radiation.
The heat accelerates electrons, creating conditions for military scientists to conduct experiments.
As the Intercept report notes, the Pentagon ploughed millions into the facility, mostly via congressional add-ons, and was still doing so as recently as 2007, when HAARP was officially completed.
It consequently seemed dubious to many that just seven years later an announcement came that the Air Force was set to close the site and dismantle the array.
Now it has been revealed that HAARP will live on. The Intercept notes:
“Physicist Dennis Papadopoulos, a professor at the University of Maryland and longtime proponent of HAARP, said the agreement that was worked out would transfer the facility from the Defense Department to the state of Alaska, and then over to the University of Alaska, which has long been involved in research at the site.”
HAARP will then operate, like other ionosphere research sites, as a scientific facility supported by those conducting experiments there. Papadopoulos said that the state of Alaska will put in about $2 million, and some additional funding may come from the National Science Foundation and the Pentagon.
So the facility will likely STILL be funded by the government, and experiments will continue to be conducted there.
This inevitably means that the theories over what HAARP is really used for will not go away, and researchers will continue to be fascinated with the mysterious facility.
The facility has long been the subject of intense scrutiny among those who believe the Pentagon constructed and used it to conduct research into everything from weather and natural phenomenon manipulation weapons to more esoteric studies, such as electronic and psychotronic mind control.
The first two videos show Michael J. Murphy reporting from the International UNESCO Conference in Paris, which is being held from July 7-10 under the banner: “Our Common Future Under Climate Change.” This third video, shot by Max Bliss presents reports from anti-geoengineering activists, Olga Raffa, Alexandra May Hunter, Terry Lawton and Michael Murphy on Day 2 of the UNESCO meeting. This last one shows Olga Raffa presenting Sir David King with the UK directive to ban Geoengineering. Filmed at the Our common future under climate change conference in Paris 2015.
This thirty-year old coin appears to show an image of a plane emitting an aerosol over the world on one side and John Paul II on the other.
800,000 of these 100 lire Vatican City coins were put into circulation in 1985. The lira, (plural lire), was the currency of the Vatican City between 1929 and 2002, at which time this stainless steel coin went out of circulation.
At a glance it seems to symbolize a form of world domination via weather modification. Is it a coincidence that thirteen years later, the new pope, Pope Francis is talking about “climate change” and the need to take action? Maybe not.
Max Bliss is at the International UNESCO Conference in Paris, which is being held from July 7-10, under the banner: “Our Common Future Under Climate Change.” As he points out in this video report it is apparent that the climate is being used as a fraudulent excuse to usher in a One World Government, which aims to implement Agenda 21 in the name of “sustainable development.” The intention of Agenda 21 is to reorganize the world around socialist, command and control regulation, as the elite view humans as earth’s primary contaminants. It will be a living nightmare if they have their way. We must be vigilant warns Max.
Max posted this video on Facebook about half-an-hour ago.
A group of prominent Australian scientists has warned climate sceptic MPs against wasting time and parliamentary resources on an inquiry into the evidence of human influence on climate change.
The scientists have sent a letter to West Australian MPs Dennis Jensen and Chris Back, offering to brief them on the latest science instead.
The letter was sent by Professor Ove Hoegh-Guldberg from the University of Queensland’s Global Change Institute and co-signed by 12 others, including Professor Will Steffen from the Australian National University and Professor Lesley Hughes from Macquarie University.
Dr Jensen and Mr Back supported a motion at the federal Liberal council meeting last month, which called for a parliamentary inquiry to examine the evidence of climate change before the Government signs up to post 2020 emissions targets.
Could this be due, at least in part, to a lack of sunshine owing to the masses of aerosol material we have witnessed being put into the atmosphere since early-2010?
A disease associated with Victorian times has been found in nearly 60 New Zealand children.
Rickets is caused by a Vitamin D deficiency and is a serious bone-growth disorder that can lead to skeletal deformity and seizures.
An Otago University study over three years identified 58 cases of rickets, a third of them in Auckland and Northland.
The study’s co-author, Ben Wheeler, said risk factors for the disorder included being under three, having darker skin pigment, being exclusively breast-fed and living in the far South, Auckland and Northland.
Listen to Ben Wheeler on Morning Report: http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/201760425/number-of-rickets-cases-on-the-rise-in-new-zealand
“I guess working at the coal face as a paediatrician and paediatric endocrinologist I see rickets every year, so we knew that it was occurring.
“And in fact probably, unfortunately, our results are probably an underestimate of the real numbers.”
Vitamin D is absorbed from food or produced by the skin when exposed to sunlight.
While breast-milk is the optimum nutrition for infants, it has low levels of naturally occurring Vitamin D, said Dr Wheeler. “So those who are breast fed are at higher risk than those who are formula fed.”
There was a “double problem” in New Zealand of too much UV from sunlight, leading to high rates of skin cancer and melanoma, but that many children were getting enough sunlight.
“The main message here is that we do think that the sun is harmful in New Zealand, and particularly for those who are very young, I think supplementation is the way forward for them.”
Dr Wheeler said at-risk mothers and children need to be better targeted for Vitamin D supplements.
Kellogg’s adds vitamin D to fight rickets after alarming rise in the condition The illness softens bones and often leaves children with bowed legs (BECAUSE THEY ARE BLOCKING THE SUN EVERY SUNNY DAY!!!)
By David Rothbard of CFACT
What could be more embarrassing for those who say climate science is “settled” than for scientific observations to reveal their dire predictions are not coming true?
Every day more scientific data emerge that poke cavernous holes into the warming narrative, and maybe that’s why some in the warmist camp are willing to tinker with the evidence.
Disturbingly, NOAA recently made a shoddy attempt to conjure up a 21st century “warming trend” by ignoring satellite data (the best available), and adjusting measurements from research buoys upward to match data from shipping – which is the least reliable.
Fortunately they didn’t get away with it.
Climatologists Pat Michaels, Richard Lindzen, and Chip Knappenberger were onto them. They pointed out that “the NOAA team adjusted sea-surface temperature (SST) data from buoys upward by 0.12º C, to make them ‘homogenous’ with lengthier records from engine intake systems in ships. However, engine intake data are ‘clearly contaminated by heat conduction’ from the ships, and the data were never intended for scientific use – whereas the global buoy network was designed for environmental monitoring.”
So why not adjust the ship data downward, to “homogenize” them with buoy data, and account for the contamination? Perhaps because, as Georgia Tech climatologist Judith Curry observed, this latest NOAA analysis “will be regarded as politically useful for the Obama Administration.”
Global warming pressure groups and the White House hope to keep our eyes off inconvenient data, either by manipulating it or distracting us with scare stories in the media, until after President Obama signs our energy future away at the UN climate conference in Paris.
Unfortunately for them, facts are facts.
The Earth is actually cooler than climate models project and the weather is normal. Extreme weather, as the data show, has been unusually tame.
Energy expert Tom Tamarkin and CFACT senior policy advisor Paul Driessen have also done their part to expose some of the propaganda tricks being played by Green advocates to lock the world’s nations into a UN climate agreement while President Obama is still in office.
In their recent article, Tamarkin and Driessen remind us that, “no category 3-5 hurricane has hit the United States for a record 9-1/2 years. Tornadoes, droughts, polar bears, polar ice, sea levels and wildfires are all in line with (or improvements on) historic patterns and trends. The Sahel is green again, thanks to that extra CO2. And the newly invented disasters they want to attribute to fossil fuel-driven climate change – allergies, asthma, ISIS and Boko Haram – don’t even pass the laugh test.”
Of course, the very notion of “settled” science is a direct contradiction of the scientific method.
If the data disprove a theory, the theory must change.
Shame on those who are trying to bend the rules.