To donate, go here: http://www.unconventionalgrey.com/
To donate, go here: http://www.unconventionalgrey.com/
This satellite image, taken from Worldview.earthdata.nasa.gov, shows New South Wales, Australia on April the 16th, 2016 with a sky covered with aerosol trails, some of which appear to be over 400ks in length.
Thank-you to DJM of South Canterbury Sky Watch for forwarding this.
The letter below was kindly supplied by post-graduate researcher, Malcolm Scott and written in reply to a letter from the Minister for the Environment which was posted on this website on April the 14th under: Very Few Reports Of Sightings of Aerosol Trails To Ministry For The Environment Compared To Facebook.
Thank-you to Mr Scott for his outstanding efforts and ongoing commitment to expose this crime. In regard to which he needs your help, also. Please email the Ministry for the Environment at email@example.com with evidence you have of atmospheric aerosol trails.
Mr Scott offers: “It is time to speak out! Despite thousands of Facebook posts related to aerosol trail sightings, according to the Ministry for the Environment, (MfE) only about 14 ‘reports’ of aerosol spraying activities were received by them since 2013. Perhaps they need more convincing. Send any photos with the date/time/location to: firstname.lastname@example.org and address the email to the Director Climate Change and ask MfE to investigate AND ask to be informed of the outcome of their investigation. Every report creates a public record to hold the MfE accountable, as they should be, to the public and the protection of the environment. I’d like to know how you get on, if you send/receive to/from MfE please message me at email@example.com or contact me on Facebook.”
Editor’s note: While Mr Scott’s letter below refers to the politically correct term: ‘atmospheric aerosol solar radiation management’ (SRM), which suggests there is evidence to show that aerosol trails are currently being used to “counteract anthropogenic climate change,” this is not supported by the evidence on this website, which shows they function as an “exotic weapon,” as defined in HR-2977. As Harold Saive, contributor to Veteran’s Today, highlights in his pivotal article on the subject, Correction: Chemtrails Are An “Exotic Weapon” Not Geoengineering for Global Warming, (2013):
by Clifford E Carnicom
Apr 06 2016
(A Partial Editorial)
There are many environmental activists who assume a certain cause and relationship between active geoengineering programs and those projects that fall under the term of “Solar Radiation Management“ (SRM). This paper will reiterate the basic fallacy of that assumption, and it will direct the reader towards a more comprehensive inquiry of the true nature of the forces and agendas that are likely to be involved.
For those that do not wish to engage in the full length of this article, the Solar Radiation Management principle is one of interfering with solar heat transfer to the earth. There are various schemes for accomplishing this which will be discussed later; the most modest of the choices requires the introduction of certain types of particulates into the stratosphere (from about 7 to 30 miles above sea level). Continue reading
If this agreement is officially adopted, there will be a massive transfer of economic and political power to unelected bodies and a transfer of trillions of dollars of wealth into the hands of the global elite. It will create a world government and a carbon dictatorship on the illusory basis that carbon dioxide is causing the planet to warm.
The ongoing use of chemtrails/weather modification technology is of significance to the climate change agenda. In New Zealand evidence shows the technology has been used to create extremes which are then blamed on “man-made climate change,” making Government’s refusal to acknowledge this technology all the more traitorous.
NZHerald, April 13, 2016
Climate Change Minister Paula Bennett will head to New York next week to sign New Zealand up to a historic climate agreement.
Mrs Bennett said the signing ceremony at the United Nations on April 22, which 130 countries will participate in, was another step towards ratifying the Paris Agreement.
There is no deadline for the ratification, which covers emissions obligations after 2020 and commits all countries to limiting global temperature rise to 1.5C this century.
Once the agreement is ratified, Mrs Bennett said, the more difficult task of moving New Zealand to a low-emissions economy would begin.
“Quite frankly, there’s some easy ways to do that, and there’s some harder ways. And I want to go down the harder path to start with.”
We need to get as many people to the theater for this special one night event as we possibly can. The global warming campaign represents a severe threat to American freedom and prosperity. This is our chance to wake up our nation and expose the lies and corruption of the “green” movement. Thank you so much for helping with this important effort.
We truly appreciate your assistance with promoting this important event.
For nature and people too,
Climate Hustle, an important new film that debunks the climate scare, will be playing in our area May 2nd for a one night only special event. I’ll be there and I hope you will too. We need to pack the house! Please spread the word.
So much of what the left claims as “settled science” is flat out wrong. It’s time that people learned the facts and wake up!
CFACT, the folks who educate the world about global warming with their “Climate Depot” news service have produced this fantastic movie that will open eyes and minds, lay out the scientific facts and keep us laughing while they do it.
May 2nd will be an historic night. I’ll be at the movies, will you?
Mr Malcolm Scott, post-graduate researcher of Christchurch contacted the Office of the Minister for the Environment, Hon. Dr Nick Smith on March the 14th, 2016 with a request for information on the reports of aerosol trails/ chemtrails the Office had received in the last three years.
If the contents of the two-page reply, posted below and dated April the 11th, is true, it shows that the Ministry had very little on record. In the column ‘Information reported’ on the table below, only 14 sightings are listed and it mentions someone from Nelson advised [chemtrails were seen] on ‘more days than not.’
You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to know why there are so few reports submitted to the Ministry for the Environment – a tiny fraction compared to the multitudes posted on Facebook.com each a year,. It is because Government has a policy to deny the existence of atmospheric aerosols and it labels those who know they are a genuine phenomenon, “conspiracy theorists.”
The use of the term “conspiracy theory” was traced back in the book: ‘Conspiracy Theory in America,’ (2013), to the CIA’s propaganda campaign that was aimed at discrediting those who questioned the Warren Commission’s bogus investigation into who killed President John F. Kennedy. It stands to reason then that this insidious term is used as a tactic to humiliate and belittle those who are able to see through the façade, and undermine and stifle the voices of those who question official government accounts.
Dr Smith has been consistently unreceptive to information regarding atmospheric aerosols and not seemed concerned at their potential impacts on New Zealand. The documentary, What in The World Are They Spraying? showed him laughing inappropriately while discussing the matter of chemtrails in Parliament on June the 15th, 2010 and while he chortled, he erroneously claimed the trails being observed “simply come from jet engines.”
As in other letters from the Ministry for the Environment to members of the public posted on this website, there is an official denial: “New Zealand is not in involved in any programme of geoengineering or solar radiation management.” Wrote Mr Scott: “The Ministry for the Environment’s narrative has officially changed from “unaware/no evidence” over the last five years to this. Well, I’m just going to have to send Dr Smith a letter about this.”
This request for information followed one submitted to the Ministry under the Official Information Act, (OIA) by Mr Scott regarding atmospheric aerosols on February the 8th, 2016. The reply, dated February the 29th and signed by Roger Lincoln, the Director of Climate Change, is at the link here: https://chemtrailsnorthnz.wordpress.com/2016/04/11/atmospheric-aerosol-researcher-asked-to-destroy-document-sent-in-error-by-the-ministry-for-the-environment/
An internal memorandum was sent in error by an employee at the Ministry for the Environment to a post-graduate researcher named Malcolm Scott of Canterbury. Mr Scott, who is investigating issues related to atmospheric aerosol operations in New Zealand, did not realize the significance of the 6-paged document until someone called him and asked him to destroy it.
On March the 11th, Mr Scott got a phone call from a member of the Climate Directorate staff informing him that a 6-page memo had been sent in error and they wanted it destroyed. Malcolm asked for the request in writing and lo and behold, later that afternoon this arrived via email:
Can you please confirm by return that you have destroyed the 6 page internal memorandum that was inadvertently released to you under the Official information (OIA). A mistake at our end and I apologise for that.
The request came as a surprise, as he had assumed the internal memo was part of the material sent in response to his questions, which included the letter posted below and dated February the 29th, 2016. However, on examining the internal memo in more detail, he understood why the Ministry for the Environment did not want him to keep it.
Titled ‘Malcolm Scott 16-D-00142′ and dated February the 24th, 2016, the internal memo is written in relation to questions Mr Scott had submitted to the Ministry under the Official Information Act, (OIA) on February the 8th, 2016, regarding atmospheric aerosol operations.
While he is unable to allow it to be published yet, it has been cited for this article.
Under the heading ‘Risks’ the memo mentions that their response to Mr Scott is considered to be “low risk” as: “There is not much material in scope and what is released is only a list of dates.”
It also refers to the perceived risk in relation to the media, indicating that keeping atmospheric aerosol operations out of the public’s consciousness is important to the government. It states: “Correspondents often make multiple requests, but all enquiries have proved to be low risk, attracting little if any public or media attention.”
Mr Scott offers: “There are repeated references to risk assessment of release of information, and it is apparent that staff are actively monitoring public and media attention to reports of aerosol forcing operations. This seems unusual given that Ministry officials have repeatedly denied any awareness of aerosol forcing operations and repeatedly claimed that there’s no evidence of these operations in New Zealand.”
Needless to state the internal memo provides important insights into the Ministry for the Environment’s policies related to OIA requests regarding aerosols operations. It strongly suggests that there is a directive to deny that atmospheric aerosol operations are taking place, thereby indicating that those in power do not respect the public’s right to know the facts when the Official Information Act is applied.
When Mr Scott received the request to destroy the internal memo, we consulted with a number of people to find out what his options were, as he believes the public has a right to see it. Investigative journalist and government watchdog, Nicky Hagar, who wrote Secret Power and Dirty Politics advised: “Malcolm has no obligation at all to destroy that memo. They slipped up and sent an internal document. They addressed it to him and sent it. It’s their problem. He would probably be entitled to be sent the same document if he applied for it under the Privacy Act anyway…”
In a letter dated April the 5th, Mr Scott requested the memo under the Privacy Act on the basis that it is related to his research inquiries and bears significant reference to information about himself. “I also advised Ministry officials and staff that they have a responsibility to act in the public good, to uphold existing environmental legislation and work with other governmental authorities to ensure legislation which protects the environment is enforced,” he offered. He is waiting for their reply.
Mr Scott, who is very concerned about this issue, said he believes the time is overdue for the Ministry for the Environment to step up to their responsibilities in relation to the aerosol spraying operations underway in New Zealand and demonstrate the environmental stewardship and leadership the public expects.
Democracy is being undermined as access to information is being denied. Reform of the Ministry’s policies is imperative in order to protect the environment and the health of humans and other species. This is far more important than maintaining secrecy. The facts regarding atmospheric aerosol operations must be released.
Below: A slideshow showing some evidence of atmospheric aerosol operations both here in New Zealand and overseas.
Below: Letter from the Ministry for the Environment, answering Malcolm Scott’s questions in a typically guarded manner.
17. Frances Mangels Talks To John Whyte About Geoengineering: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9jf_nVLGDTo
20. As weatherman, Scott Stevens, who has examined the use of chemtrails using time-lapse equipment has noted however, SRM is a very poor explanation for the chemtrail program, as there is something far deeper, more complex and important than simply “making clouds to keep out sunshine” from an already cooling planet going on.
In order to maintain the illusion that all is at it should be, the “powers-that-be” have created a vast and sophisticated propaganda matrix. Based upon obfuscation and lies, the mainstream media, and our societal and political systems, in conjunction with a host of disinformation websites are enabling the elite to control the ‘climate change’ debate, to put the blame for extreme weather on “carbon dioxide,” and pretend aerosol trails, also known as “chemtrails,” are merely water vapour.
For example, when chemtrails are shown during TV weather reports in New Zealand, viewers are misled regarding their origins and nature. Likewise, the Ministry of Education provides children with booklets to teach that aerosol trails are natural cloud formations, while the Ministry for the Environment ignores the indisputable proof that chemtrails/geo-engineering is occurring, and lies to advise that the strange-looking, lingering trails being seen are merely vapour trails. And when employees of the Crown-owned research institute, the National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research, (NIWA), have been questioned by myself and others regarding all the evidence of the use of climate engineering and aerosols around New Zealand in recent years, they fail to acknowledge these crimes.
Malcolm Scott, a researcher in Canterbury who proposes to do a thesis related to atmospheric aerosols, submitted requests under the Official Information Act on the 9th and 25th of February, 2016 to the Environmental Protection Authority, (EPA). Not surprisingly, like the EPA in the US, which claims on its website that the persistent trails left by aircraft are only water vapour and contain no harmful chemicals, the replies Malcolm received from the New Zealand EPA indicate that it is also a taxpayer-funded propaganda machine. (See the letters below).
A case in point, in the letter dated March the 4th, 2016, the EPA takes the official position that high altitude aerosol spraying from aircraft in New Zealand “does not exist.”
To allege that atmospheric aerosol spraying “does not exist” in this context is a form of false dichotomy, as it excludes the rational proposal that there may not have been a proper investigation, and therefore, there is not enough information to prove that the claim they “do not exist” is either true or false.
Interestingly, this same concealment tactic was used in the official story of the attacks of 9/11 by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, (NIST), who fallaciously claimed that “no evidence exists” for explosive/pyrotechnic materials in the WTC buildings, when overwhelming evidence of these materials was found by investigators independent of NIST.
NIST failed to consider explosives or pyrotechnic materials in any of its hypotheses, even though this omission was at odds with the requirement of the national standard for fire investigation which calls for testing related to thermite and other pyrotechnics.
Back to the EPA. The name Environmental Protection Authority has been in use since 2009, applying to a unit of the Ministry for the Environment responsible for administering a section of the Resource Management Act. The Environmental Protection Authority as it is now began operations in July 2011 under its own Act, the Environmental Protection Authority Act 2011. This Act requires the EPA to contribute to the effective and transparent management of New Zealand’s environment and natural and physical resources.
Note that while the EPA claimed in its first letter to Malcolm, dated February the 18th, 2016 that it had not received any information regarding sightings of high altitude aerosol spraying from members of the public, in its second letter dated March the 4th it indicates that it received an email from Mr. W Ryan on February the 18th, 2011, which it referred to the Ministry for the Environment, because the inquiry fell outside the EPA’s responsibility [at that time]. Thus, the EPA staff know that the Ministry for the Environment has correspondence on this issue, as readers of this website know of, and this includes from the Mayor of Kaikoura.
In addition, note that the EPA claims on its website at http://www.epa.govt.nz, that its role under the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) Act is the regulation of pesticides, dangerous goods, household chemicals and other dangerous substances. It further offers: “This means we put controls in place to manage the risks of hazardous substances to safeguard people and the environment.” If only this were true where atmospheric aerosol spraying was concerned.
In addition, former US government employee and respected researcher, Clifford Carnicom has been investigating and reporting on aspects of these aerosols for over a decade, including what they are doing to the environment and our health. Alarmingly, he has evidence to show that aerosol trails are achieving far more than modifying the atmosphere. His research has shown that the aerosols also contain bio-engineered filaments that are infecting the global population with exotic, cross domain bacteria which do not exist in nature.
Therefore, because the EPA denies the existence of these high altitude atmospheric aerosols and refuses to investigate them when a vast body of evidence shows that they are real and harmful, not only is it exhibiting a high degree of negligence and failing in its duty of care under the HSNO Act, but in keeping the public in ignorance and concealing the truth, it is complicit in enabling this crime against humanity and the environment to continue.
“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for a disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist.” – Former US President, Dwight Eisenhower
17. Frances Mangels Talks To John Whyte About Geoengineering: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9jf_nVLGDTo
19. Chemtrail PsyOps: NBC News Reports Jet “Contrails” Change Our Weather For the “Better” 20. As weatherman, Scott Stevens, who has examined the use of chemtrails using time-lapse equipment has noted however, SRM is a very poor explanation for the chemtrail program, as there is something far deeper, more complex and important than simply “making clouds to keep out sunshine” from an already cooling planet going on.