Updated 9.33pm
Today we received a phone call from a resident of Kaukapakapa, which is around 50 kilometers (31 miles) northwest of Auckland, who reported seeing a massive chemtrail at about 10.30am, which he said had come from the north. He said the material looked as if it was descending and that he is considering getting a rainwater analysis done.
While he did not use Flightradar24.com to identify the aircraft, he believes it was flying too high to land at Auckland airport and may have landed at Wellington or Christchurch airport.
We also received a photo (below) from John H. of Matakana, which is about 67 kilometers north-west of Auckland, who witnessed the same aerosol trail, which he advises hung in the sky for about an hour. He took the photo at about 10.30am.
CLICK ON MAP TO ENLARGE. Showing Kaukapakapa and Matakana, north of Auckland, New Zealand.
NORTHLAND NEW ZEALAND CHEMTRAILS WATCH 
Hi On the 27th Dec. chemtrails were laid over Marlborough and then a few days later they were back at it again over Blenheim. This time I took these photos. There should have been a great big Blue sky with the massive High we had but it turned silvery/wispy all over and hazed out the sun for about a day, then thick cloud cover formed -but it didn’t rain.
In hope for a better world always, G. Barnes
Keep them eyes to the sky, cameras clicking. More and more everyday are awakening to this crap. I just returned from the West Coast (Hokitika), didn’t see one flight, chem line flight until I was in Arthur’s Pass. I knew they were spraying, as I could see 2 intersecting lines, that had spread out big time.
For those who are unaware of what goes on above, take some time, eyes up and I’m sure you will see one of these filthy lines being sprayed. With the change of flight paths, if you don’t see one today, check over the next couple days or over a week. I would be gob-smacked if you don’t see one.
Who knows anything about the fuel our beautiful Air New Zealand or Jetstar are using???
I don’t think the evidence is there to indicate the aerosols are coming from the fuel. Aerosol delivery devices can be seen covering much of a wing span at times, for example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSSWnXQsgOU
Also, there is the alleged whistleblower who referred to the tubing inside the aircraft and a control box: http://chemtrailsplanet.net/2013/01/17/whistleblower-airline-mechanic-reveals-details-of-chemtrail-operation/
Just a recent oberservation ,in the current climate we would usually get convection showers in this type of weather.We used to get them every day but not anymore?Is this why they would fly down the centre of the country?
The planes leaving persistent contrails (coming from commercial flights I have identified on flightradar)have no apparent nozzles.I have closely examined an Air NZ flight often seen leaving trailso,closely being with binoculars from Auckland terminal viewing area.
A Quantas flight attendant commented to me ‘We dont do that,Air NZ does though’ when I asked her ‘do these planes leave trails in the sky?’ When you consider the security around the handling of jet fuel it would be very very difficult,bordering impossible for anyone to obtain a fuel sample other than from those that are supposedly covering this up.
Thanks for your comment. In regard to this please note as an example that a statement from an alleged whistleblower referred to the passenger planes’ (fake) static discharge wicks being hollowed out and used to spew out aerosols. In this case, the planes in question would not appear to have nozzles.
The alleged whistleblower wrote: “…Sure enough, the plane I choose had the extra equipment!
I began to trace the system of pipes, pumps, and tanks. I found what appeared to be the control unit for the system. It was a standard looking avionics control box but it had no markings of any kind. I could trace the control wires from the box to the pumps and valves but there were no control circuits coming into the unit. The only wires coming into the unit was a power connection to the aircraft’s main power bus.
The system had 1 large and 2 smaller tanks. It was hard to tell in the cramped compartment but it looked like the large tank could hold 50 gallons. The tanks were connected to a fill and drain valve that passed through the fuselage just behind the drain valve for the waste system. When I had a chance to look for this connection under the plane I found it cunningly hidden behind a panel under the panel used to access the waste drain.
I began to trace the piping from the pumps. These pipes lead to a network of small pipes that ended in the trailing edges of the wings and horizontal stabilizers. If you look closely at the wings of a large airplane you will see a set of wires, about the size of your finger, extending from the trailing edge of the wing surfaces. These are the static discharge wicks. They are used to dissipate the static electric charge that builds up on a plane in flight. I discovered that the pipes from this mystery system lead to every 1 out of 3 of these static discharge wicks. These wicks had been “hollowed out” to allow whatever flows through these pipes to be discharged through these fake wicks.”
More: http://goldenageofgaia.com/2011/11/16/airline-mechanic-blows-the-whistle-on-chemtrail-operation/
In respect to the flight attendant claiming that Qantas do not leave trails, refer this one example of many which contradict her claim: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUuk-Si_mh0
In regard to the matter of the aerosols coming from jet fuel in your opinion, please refer this which may or may not be related: ‘Ex-Military Whistleblower Exposes Powdered Metals Imported to Air Force Bases’. Kristen Meghan is blowing the whistle on the Air Force. She has witnessed the importation of canisters of powdered toxic metals including aluminum and barium onto U.S. Air Force bases.
More: http://globalskywatch.com/featured/Kristen-Meghan.html#.VK3CCnszu1s
I don’t doubt there are countless modified planes out there,but I do recall what a quarryman told me one day when I pointed out a seriously fat trail from a commercial flight from Tokyo to Auckland.He had read that Air NZ had recently begun using a new environmental friendly fuel blend to help reduce its carbon footprint.He was not fazed when I pointed out the irony of this thick dirty apricot trail being ‘clean and green’…’,the paper said it was good so it must be’ he replied.
It did get me thinking about a couple of things,firstly TPTB like to tell partial truths, like instead of admitting chemtrailing outright they can imply their new fuel blend is good for the environment,even if that is because it will kill off billions….secondly, people generally don’t dare to think critically so through media manipulation the masses are very easily controlled.Covert fuel additives seem the easiest option by far.A picture says a thousand words…but unlike a photo of unusual hardware on or in a plane,suspect fuel would be hard to test both from getting a sample through to actual obtaining legitimate results and even then it would be very easy to deny given the TPTB can manipulate public opinion so easily.
It was reported in the Herald NZ that Air NZ was trialling bio fuel, which they called ‘environmentally friendly’ 7 years ago. Could this be what he was referring to?:
Air New Zealand Announces Bio Fuel Research Initiative (2007)
http://www.airnewzealand.co.nz/press-release-2007-bio-fuel-research-initiative-28sep07
Also, the Air NZ suggests on their website that reducing carbon dioxide emissions is a way of being environmentally friendly, (even though the gas is essential to life). eg quote: ” Within the last four years alone, Air New Zealand has instigated 41 projects which have had or are having a positive environmental impact. Between August 2004 and March 2008 our carbon dioxide emissions were reduced by 90,963 tonnes a year. Planned new initiatives will increase that to 130,000 tonnes each year.” Refer: http://www.airways.co.nz/aspire/_content/airnz.asp
You state it would be easiest, in your opinion to include the aerosols in the fuel. I wonder what the people who design the engines and the airlines that pay vast sums for them, would say about this? What would say 10,000 kgs of metal particulates do to a jet engine in your opinion? http://animagraffs.com/inside-a-jet-engine/
And how does the process work please, as they need to be able to turn the aerosol on and off during a flight, but keep the jet fuel flowing into the engines, obviously.
By the way, a chap in Christchurch posted a video on Facebook of a twin propeller plane with aerosol material coming out near the wing tips, away from the engines.
Plus, a whistleblower who was employed as a private contractor for Evergreen Airlines, reported that he was retro fitting 727 and 747-c aircraft with liquid discharge tanks and aerosol sprayer devices? Read more: http://www.disclose.tv/forum/evergreen-air-outed-as-cia-company-for-chemtrail-operations-t47115.html#ixzz3OB5ODxBs If his claims are true, and if it is ‘easier’ to include aerosols in the jet fuel, why do you think the powers-that-be would bother adding extra tanks and aerosol delivery devices to aircraft to disseminate the trails of white stuff?
Unlike an internal combustion engine in your car a jet engine has only one major moving part the compressor.All modern commercial jets use what’s known as a high bypass turbo fan jet engine.This refers to a large fan (that simply pushes air) directly driven by a smaller jet behind the fan.The term high by pass refers to the fact the fan provides more thrust than the jet which also provides thrust.The addition of aluminium oxide to the fuel would have absolutely no impact at all to the longevity or function of the jet up to concentrations that would markedly diminish volatility of the fuel.Over the life of the engine I’m certain 10,000kgs of aluminium oxide added to the fuel at say 1% would have no detrimental effects. In fact I think the opposite may be true as aluminium is the main component of thermite (Al plus Iron oxide)which has one of the most volatile reactions( i.e. it burns hot enough to melt steel) so the concentrations of Aluminium,Barium ,Strontium and others could well be much higher than 1%.I challenge anyone to show any adverse effects of adding aluminium oxide to a jet engine.
As for turning the trails on and off that is an assumption many make when they see what appears to be just that.After many years as a younger man riding motorcycles early morning to work in winter I can attest that there are always warmer and colder patches of air that I rode through.The relevant point is it is plausible that when a plane appears to turn off the chemtrails it may just be flying through warmer air. Also the addition of Aluminium would in my opinion still not produce plumes of white trails at low altitudes,(i.e. warm air)until the same physics process that ‘they’ claim to be causing ‘contrails’ takes effect.
It is also from your evidence equally plausible that the ‘additives’ are added by way of a switch you could turn off and on.My main point is adding to the fuel or injecting additives into the jet engine at any point would have no adverse effect to either the operation or longevity of the engine as the only moving part is the compressor and the fuel does not lubricate its bearings.
You state: “Over the life of the engine I’m certain 10,000kgs of aluminium oxide added to the fuel at say 1% would have no detrimental effects.”
To produce an aerosol trail say 100 kilometers long, which if ones uses an example from this Aurora Flight sciences paper of a payload requirement at 0.03 kg/m flown, that would be 3,000 kgs – that is a fair amount for each flight, for example. I can not prove that it would damage an engine, but it seems commonsense that it would lead to deposits on engine parts and perhaps higher maintenance costs due to more wear and tear on engine parts. This paper discusses the issues of using sulphuric acid, David Keith’s proposal on engine wear and tear FYI: http://www.keith.seas.harvard.edu/Misc/AuroraGeoReport.pdf
You state:
“As for turning the trails on and off that is an assumption many make when they see what appears to be just that.After many years as a younger man riding motorcycles early morning to work in winter I can attest that there are always warmer and colder patches of air that I rode through.The relevant point is it is plausible that when a plane appears to turn off the chemtrails it may just be flying through warmer air.”
How do you explain the appearance of alleged aerosol material so close to an engine in these images? Surely the air is far too hot for aerosols to be visible according to your theory?
https://chemtrailsnorthnz.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/4-jets-spraying-chemtrails-c.jpg
Yeah Clare, evidence is the big word. Surely the day has got to come where one of the airline workers comes out and SPEAKS out. There have been a couple people, around the globe, but surely there has to be Kiwi that can inform us on what he or she see,s in these airlines.
On another note, for anyone interested, Conspiracy Oz, has a website, Australia based, that has good info too. A podcast not so long ago, by Mick Raven can be listened to hear, which of course will get one to the Con Oz website.
http://conspiracyoz.podomatic.com/entry/2014-12-06T23_53_11-08_00
(Around the 50.38 mark is a wrap for my video.)
The Manhattan Project involved over 130,000 employees at one stage and that was kept quiet. The government never admitted to it, the media never reported on it, and people had no idea for over 25 years.
For those who had not seen this, a whistleblower who was employed as a private contractor for Evergreen Airlines, reported that he was retro fitting 727 and 747-c aircraft with liquid discharge tanks and aerosol sprayer devices. Read more: http://www.disclose.tv/forum/evergreen-air-outed-as-cia-company-for-chemtrail-operations-t47115.html#ixzz3OB5ODxBs
Hi all ,I was fishing at 10.30-11am on the 6th in the Tamaki river Auckland and observed a north south stop start trail being laid. The jet flew across Glendowie towards Pakuranga giving 4 distinct spurts in that distance. I would have taken a pic if had a camera.I didn’t have any luck trying to find this flight on flightradar24 .
It is highly likely the system your post describes would be needed to disperse biological agents into the atmosphere.I have witnessed a military plane spraying at low altitude over Northland and had decided that the military were responsible for all biological agents such as those thought to cause morgellons through to the fibres many of us have noticed falling across Northland at various times.I have long held the belief that aluminium and other metals were being added to Jet fuel.
Obviously the heat of combustion and probably the fuel itself would destroy most known biological agents.The system the whistleblower mechanic describes would be perfect for biological agent dispersal from commercial aircraft.My point is there are likely two separate projects operating in our airspace,one for modifying the electrical and resonant qualities of our atmosphere to facilitate ‘Tesla’ type technologies (dispersing Aluminium,Barium,Strontium etc) and another project for dispersal of nano technologies and biological agents.We could be both right with some planes actually dispersing chemtrails from two separate sources.
What would be the point of spraying biological agents at the high altitude a commercial jet flies at, say 28-30,000 feet? It would be extremely inefficient. Why not spray biological agents using very low level spraying instead? That would make far more sense.
Here is a photo of a C-130 demonstrating aerosol spraying ability at a low level, taken from ‘Chemtrails Confirmed’ by William Thomas. The aerosol is coming out from the wing area, not the engines.
https://chemtrailsnorthnz.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/scn_0002.jpg
In regard to Morgellons, you state that the fibers we are seeing (such as these: https://chemtrailsnorthnz.wordpress.com/2010/06/05/more-long-fibers-seen-floating-through-the-air-on-june-4/), are thought to cause Morgellons. From the evidence I have seen there is more than one kind of fiber. Perhaps the long and highly reflective fibers we have seen in Northland, play a role in weather modification? The reason I state this is that Betty Rowe of Arapawa Is had fibers tested and they were found to be high in aluminium and barium. (The website the results were on, MysteriousNZ, has been shut down, unfortunately.) Plus, stated Canadian chemtrails researcher, William Thomas on Coast To Coast AM with George Knapp, on December 20, 2009: “Bernard Eastlund, [the inventor of HAARP], wrote me an e-mail…and he said that to heat up the atmosphere with HAARP was very difficult, it would go right through the atmosphere unless you put some element in that airspace that it could heat and he suggested that polymers would work very well in allowing HAARP to be directed to heat certain sections of the atmosphere. And in fact, we’ve been seeing…cobweb like material, polymer material all over the United States and other locations, in conjunction with airplanes flying overhead emitting something out of the back end of them. And Eastlund went further and said that heat generation works by adding magnetic iron oxide to the polymer…” –William Thomas on Coast To Coast AM with George Knapp, December 20, 2009.
You state that the heat of combustion would destroy most biological agents. I understand Morgellons fibers are quite heat resistant according to Clifford Carnicom’s work.
You state you believe there are two separate projects, one involved in “dispersal of nano technologies and biological agents,” and the other modifying the electrical…qualities of the atmosphere.
According to aerosol researcher, Clifford Carnicom aerosol trails serve at least 7 functions: environmental modification and control, including weather control; biological operations; electromagnetic operations, including H.A.A.R.P., and cell towers; military applications; planetary and geophysical modification; a global surveillance system, and to detect ionic disturbances from exotic propulsion systems.
Scott Stevens of Weatherwars.info has stated that his research indicates that around 99% of the trails are being used for weather modification projects.
FYI here is another plane spraying an aerosol – this one is flying at high altitude, spraying an aerosol, not coming out of its engines: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=bSSWnXQsgOU
I saw that chemtrail over our place in the Kaipara. There was another one today, at 1.50pm, it didn’t last long but it ran from southeast to northwest, absolutely massive across a clear sky. I took a short video of it on my phone if you’re interested.
Thanks Jenny. Could you upload the video to YouTube please and post the link please?
Do you have a single photo from a member that shows the same emissions as infowars pics A-D?Sorry but They appear photoshopped.I wondered if they were holographic planes perhaps being controlled by the unidentified object ‘what’s that object at 8 oclock?’.….Some people even believe orbs have some role in aerosol spraying.See an orb,turn your back for a second and when you turn back the ‘whole sky’ is sprayed full of aerosol,trails everywhere.
I have taken hundreds of pics of planes leaving chemtrails and have never seen any like disinfo wars pics.Your members have sent you thousands,please post one showing trails from jets at altitude that show the same thing you referred to in pics A-D that we can confirm hasn’t been photoshopped and contains original id stamp from camera used.
You compare sulphuric acid to aluminium and barium oxides in relation to engine wear?I’m pretty certain acid would cause harm.Aluminium like lead is a heavy metal,acid is not a heavy metal.Adding lead to fuel both aided combustion and clean burning and reduced engine wear.Adding acid would not.Adding lead to fuel aids in lubrication,adding acid would not.Adding aluminium oxide to fuel would also aid combustion and lubrication and would not cause any fouling.I never studied the properties of Barium or Strontium when I did my NZCE at Auckland Tech but where they appear on the Periodic table I would assume Barium at least to have the same properties in fuel.You comment that spraying biologicals from cruising altitude would be inefficient,yet still my paddocks get covered by fibres,with no low flying planes in sight.
I do agree I too have seen a HC130 flying at low altitudes and definitely spraying a brown haze close to population centres in Northland,but that doesn’t explain fibres falling from altitude after high altitude chemtrailling with no low flying planes present before sighting fibres.I base my theories on the evidence I have seen and viewed,through the perspective I have from what I’ve learned formally and what I have experienced over the last 50 years.I encourage challenging debate and respect your site and what you do here as I have found the other sites liberally moderated to be absolutely fully infiltrated with highly skilled disinfo shills.
The photos were not from Infowars.com hawkeye. Read the words at the bottom of the A-D composition -“chemtrailsplanet,” which is Harold Saive’s work, not that of Infowars.com.
https://chemtrailsnorthnz.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/not-from-engines1hp4f9f332f.jpg
Here are some more photos found using Google.com and the search terms “chemtrails” and “plane” that show aerosols close to the engines: https://chemtrailsnorthnz.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/not-from-engines-5ecn-4242_detail.jpg
https://chemtrailsnorthnz.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/not-from-engines3haik05.jpg
https://chemtrailsnorthnz.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/not-from-engines-chemtrailsprayplane1.jpg
https://chemtrailsnorthnz.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/not-from-engines-nozzles-on-chemtrail-spraying-plane_400.png
https://chemtrailsnorthnz.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/not-from-engines4maxresdefault.jpg
The photos shown are as you said from websites,I ask again do you have a single picture that has been photographed by a member? The first pic I cant tell if its military or not as only a section of the wing is shown.The American Airlines plane(red and blue stripes) may be a passenger jet but most likely is a cargo/freight plane and does not fly in NZ skies,the rest appear to be military aircraft which supports my theory and observations that passenger aircraft are leaving trails from fuel additives causing aluminium rich contrails while military (and likely commercial non-passenger) aircraft are dispersing the biological components.Just post 1 photo(specifically showing passenger aircraft spraying with emissions not from engines or with no gap between engine and trail)taken from a member that You have contact details for so we can get to the bottom of this please.
So I take it you are implying that information sourced from the internet is deemed to be unworthy evidence? Does that not render it unworthy if I post it on here also, as this is a website? Perhaps you should not be posting information sourced from the internet either, then?
The fact that as far as I can recall no one has sent a photo for this site or to Chemtrails over NZ on Facebook.com taken with a telescopic lens, which allows us to see that the trails are close to the engines does not invalidate the claim that we were addressing that aerosol trails are apparent when the air is hot, which was the point I was trying to make by posting those photos.
Are the military focused on spraying ‘biologicals’, or primarily aluminium, strontium and barium and other metals used in aerosols for weather control/modeling purposes?
As mentioned, Air Force Industrial Hygienist / Environmental Specialist, K. Meghan reported seeing powdered aluminium oxide, strontium and barium on Tinker Air Force base, Oklahoma, where she was stationed at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAxXyMAmBMs
What do you mean by biologicals and what evidence do you have to show that this is what the US military is focused on disseminating currently?
http://before it’s news.com/chemtrails/2011/08/chemtrails-produced-by-aviation-fuel-laced-with-trimethylaluminum-934747.html
http://beforeitsnews.com/chemtrails/2011/08/chemtrails-produced-by-aviation-fuel-laced-with-trimethylaluminum-934747.html
http://www.examiner.com/article/joyce-riley-exposes-covert-aerosol-geoengineering-chemtrails-on-the-power-hour
As rainwater tests have proven much of our hazy aerosol filled atmosphere must have abnormally high levels of aluminium and barium,even on what we perceive to be cloudless days.I feel most are agreement here that the aerosol matter is of nano particle size or it would simply fall to earth in short order.Using a spotlight at night confirms large quantities of tiny particulates do in fact fact fall constantly to earth.It seems highly likely that sticky polymer fibres would absorb aluminium and barium by simply falling from high altitudes.I have also read and watched Bernard Eastlund tell of using polymers to enhance the effects of Haarp and it does seem likely to me that the clumping together of polymers into fibres is a side effect of the dispersal of polymers through fuel with the heat of combustion causing their structure to alter and then clump together.The clumping of polymers into fibres doesnt seem to fill the conductive requirements as they soon fall to earth.Maybe they fall to earth as fibres AFTER fullfillling their function with the clumping the result of heating by HAARP,as fibres have been reported falling independantly of any chemtrail sightings,Im open to all possibilities here!
As I mentioned earlier in agreement with your acceptance of modified planes,I believe some planes are spraying both biologicals and leaving chemtrails from fuel additives.In these scenarios I envisage say a large tanker spraying biologicals which then are absorbed by the reflective fibres produced by polymer fuel additives.The altitude may be inefficient from a point of view of killing a targeted species such as moths,but I don’t think instant death of the target is their agenda,surely it is more likely they seek covert widespread infection through undetected dispersal of biologicals.In summary commercial jets are unwittingly using fuel that disperses large quantities of Aluminium,Barium and Strontium as metal oxides and possibly even polymers that are widely dispersing in our Atmosphere,while military Jets from the US are dispersing biological agents as well as all of the other additives,in addition NZ’s air force is definitely involved in low level spraying of unknown substances that from my firsthand observation was a rusty brown to apricot coloured spray which gave me flu like symptoms for a day.
I don’t believe rainwater tests have proven that aluminium and barium are at high levels in the atmosphere on cloudless days. We need to somehow collect the particles in the air on cloudless days to prove this. Clifford Carnicom collected air samples in New Mexico in 2002 using air filters. He found high levels of barium in the air. Please refer: http://www.carnicominstitute.org/articles/precip1.htm
On that note:
EPA Air Quality Management Rule 402 Nuisance
A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury… (Cited in Chemtrails Confirmed by William Thomas on page 186).
If their aim is to reduce the human population covertly and slowly, do they need “biologicals,” given that the tiny particles themselves are a health hazard? Refer:
https://chemtrailsnorthnz.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/scn_00021.jpg
https://chemtrailsnorthnz.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/scn_0001.jpg
Here is a patent re: US Navy patent using jet fuel which includes aluminium, dated 1976:
http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/sites/default/files/file/us_navy/417JH_14_1976_U.S._Navy_DTIC_Aluminum_Soap_Demisting_Agent_in_Jet_Fuel_November_30_1976_Abstract.pdf
Clare you ask me(hawkeyelive) questions then you block me from answering? I’m not looking to prove you wrong just to find the truth,the honey truck story is far easier to disprove,you don’t need to be an industrial chemist(fuel analysis) you just need a cell phone with a cam to photograph one planes extra equipment,hasn’t happened yet….You are correct I shouldn’t be posting pics from the net but if you watch the link from b4itsnews you will find the same photo you posted(tanker enemy) is a screenshot from the video supporting the fuel additive theory.This was my point,internet sourced photos can be used to support anything.
I’m just surprised that if this was commonplace no one ‘we’ know has taken a photo yet.
My business is digital aerial photography and I can analyse original imagery for digital manipulation rather easily,however low resolution screen shots and pictures off websites are not so easy to verify,which is why I am interested in an original image from a ‘real’ person.
As for infowars I have analysed all available 911 TV coverage and along with many others have been rebuffed by AJ and the 911 ‘truth’ movement for pointing out the fact that ALL the TV broadcast imagery has been manipulated,most likely the second tower was hit by a missile or small plane as many independent witnesses (including friends of mine) have said.Alex Jones did not predict 911, he had inside information.Alex Jones did not sneak into a Bilderberger meeting,he was invited.These are my beliefs,respect them as I tolerate others religious beliefs.Its also my belief that religion is mind control and religious people are either easily led or like to lead the easily led(Alex Jones again..)
In any case if you can respect my beliefs that AJ is a disinformation shill then you will understand I need more evidence than pictures sourced from his site.
Fortunately I can’t speak for the military or know their primary focus.I assume they spray biologicals on a mission by mission basis,while likely they are constantly delivering Al,Ba etc through their use of additives in their fuel.
Biologicals may include viruses,bacteria,blood plasma etc all probably genetically modified.I have noticed increased spraying at the same time as TV commercials are promoting flu shots but that may just be coincidence,like the Army doing excercises at Christchurch before the quake was reported by John Carter as ‘just a coincidence’.
I did not block you from answering. I have been busy on a project to bring further awareness to the chemtrail issue at an address in Whangarei which does not have internet access and then when I did get online last night to read my mail, I first read the excellent news from Sharon in Wanganui, who advised that her mother in Palmerston North had said there was a letter and a large photo of chemtrails in the Manawatu Tribune, plus, as I subsequently found out after accessing the newspaper online, there was also an article which referred to the aluminium-contaminated hailstones in Motueka. I spent sometime organizing the information for the related post on this site and did not get to bed until 1am. I am sorry for the delay in posting your comments, which as you probably have gathered recently I like to have sometime to reply to, but this time I did not.
Ps correction,disprove should be prove
The plane shown in tanker enemy pic above appear at around 12.40 into beforeitsnews.com/chemtrails link above by hawkeyelive
Thanks for not blocking me,assumptions are the mother of all f***-ups! More importantly thank you for all the good work you do getting the message out! I don’t doubt your intentions or your integrity and realise how hard it must be doing this rather thankless task,especially as I begin to realise how apathetic most of the public are to this deadly serious issue.
Today began cloudless in the Bay of Islands so I didn’t have my camera with me this morning, but a short time after NZ99 scheduled flight this morning I noticed a very thick billowing white trail visible through and above the more normal looking clouds.
Thank-you for yours, for waking people up. It is not easy when the public has been brainwashed from birth.
I noticed that one of the pictures above originally came from this website
http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Photo/B-747/HTML/ECN-4242.html
In 1974 the NASA Flight Research Center (later Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards, California) used a Boeing 747 as part of the overall NASA study of trailing vortices. Trailing vortices are the invisible flow of spiraling air that trails from the wings of large aircraft and can “upset” smaller aircraft flying behind them … Six smoke generators were installed under the wings of the 747 to provide a visual image of the trailing vortices.
P.S.I thought I should say that I put that comment up yesterday because I think that you should not have pictures on the site that can be discredited – if trolls or shills see that it makes you an easy target and they can use it against you to undermine your credibility.
I had a quick look on a shill site and sure enough, that picture is on this page http://contrailscience.com/things-that-are-not-contrails-or-chemtrails/
It occurred to me that since that since “contrailscience” and “metabunk” are known disinformation sites, perhaps this story has been fabricated to cover up chemtrails, but on checking further I think we can be pretty sure that the photo and story about wake vortex research are genuine, as some fatal plane crashes are known to have been caused by turbulence from one plane upsetting another plane that is too close behind it – there is more information about the research here http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/about/Organizations/Technology/Facts/TF-2004-14-DFRC.html