Post-graduate researcher, Malcolm Scott.
Post-graduate researcher, Malcolm Scott has been continuing his investigations into the Ministry for the Environment’s responses to the public’s concerns about aerosol trails aka “chemtrails.”
On May the 11th, 2016 he submitted a request under the Official Information Act 1982 for chemtrail-related correspondence between the Ministry
and the Civil Aviation Authority,
to find out why the Ministry
had changed its tactics and had started directing members of the public who wrote to them about chemtrails to the CAA
website. Here is such an example – this reply was emailed from the Ministry
on the 3rd of May, 2016 to Mr Jim Reece of Whangarei, who on the 11th of December, 2015 had written to the Ministry
about a Dash 8
aircraft spraying aerosol trails over Christchurch from its wings.
These trails were not
coming from the engine area, thereby proving that the trails were not ‘contrails’:
Before April 2016, the Ministry often replied to those writing regarding aerosol trail sightings by advising deceptively that the lingering trails were merely “vapour trails.” Now it seems they are passing the buck to another government institution, (which the CAA is).
In the Ministry’s
reply to Malcolm’s OIA request came these two pages showing email evidence of some of what occurred between between Ministry
and CAA staff:
Offers Malcolm: “It looks like MfE requested advice from the CAA sometime prior to the 28th of April, 2016 and received information, and then the CAA decided, or was requested by MfE, to ‘upload’ this to their website. Then on the 3rd of May, the CAA contacted the MfE to advise that “it is live now” (the ‘revised’ CAA webpage).
From the 3rd of May, 2016 this is the web-page that the MfE now refers the public to when they are contacted about aerosol sightings. This really only confirms what we had figured out. There would have been further communication by phone, but we are not likely to get this since there may be no written records.”
New Zealand taxpayers are paying for brainwashing… A noteworthy component of propaganda is not just false or spun information, but the omission of critical information to enable the reader to place the information in a meaningful context.
Because the Ministry
and the CAA
fail to openly investigate the aerosol spraying activity that is occurring in spite of a plethora of evidence to show that they are real and harmful to human health and the environment, not only are they exhibiting a high degree of negligence and the Ministry
failing in its duty of care under the Hazardous Substances & New Organisms Act 1996
, but in attempting to conceal the truth, they are complicit in enabling this crime against humanity and the environment to continue.
Although the evidence to confirm the existence of aerosol trails is readily apparent, when confronted with questions about this crime against humanity and the environment, the government claims it does not exist. Their repeated claim of CO2-driven climate change, without acknowledgment of the overwhelming evidence of weather modification due to aerosol spraying-related activities, represents both a breach of trust and a serious corruption of the public’s beliefs regarding “man-made climate change.”
Researcher Tells Ministry For The Environment They Are Negligent
Very Few Reports Of Sightings of Aerosol Trails To Ministry For The Environment Compared To Facebook
Atmospheric Aerosol Researcher Asked To Destroy Document Sent In Error By The Ministry For The Environment
Another Fob Off From The NZ Ministry For The Environment Regarding Chemtrails
“Bollocks” Writes Kaikoura’s Mayor In Reply To Todd Krieble, Of The Ministry For The Environment
NZ Environmental Protection Authority Negligent Treating High Altitude Aerosol Spraying As If It “Does Not Exist”
Chemtrails Become Contrails & Cirrostratus Clouds In The Kiwi Kids Cloud Identification Guide