In order to maintain the illusion that all is at it should be, the “powers-that-be” have created a vast and sophisticated propaganda matrix. Based upon obfuscation and lies, the mainstream media, and our societal and political systems, in conjunction with a host of disinformation websites are enabling the elite to control the ‘climate change’ debate, to put the blame for extreme weather on “carbon dioxide,” and pretend aerosol trails, also known as “chemtrails,” are merely water vapour.
For example, when chemtrails are shown during TV weather reports in New Zealand, viewers are misled regarding their origins and nature. Likewise, the Ministry of Education provides children with booklets to teach that aerosol trails are natural cloud formations, while the Ministry for the Environment ignores the indisputable proof that chemtrails/geo-engineering is occurring, and lies to advise that the strange-looking, lingering trails being seen are merely vapour trails. And when employees of the Crown-owned research institute, the National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research, (NIWA), have been questioned by myself and others regarding all the evidence of the use of climate engineering and aerosols around New Zealand in recent years, they fail to acknowledge these crimes.
Malcolm Scott, a researcher in Canterbury who proposes to do a thesis related to atmospheric aerosols, submitted requests under the Official Information Act on the 9th and 25th of February, 2016 to the Environmental Protection Authority, (EPA). Not surprisingly, like the EPA in the US, which claims on its website that the persistent trails left by aircraft are only water vapour and contain no harmful chemicals, the replies Malcolm received from the New Zealand EPA indicate that it is also a taxpayer-funded propaganda machine. (See the letters below).
A case in point, in the letter dated March the 4th, 2016, the EPA takes the official position that high altitude aerosol spraying from aircraft in New Zealand “does not exist.”
To allege that atmospheric aerosol spraying “does not exist” in this context is a form of false dichotomy, as it excludes the rational proposal that there may not have been a proper investigation, and therefore, there is not enough information to prove that the claim they “do not exist” is either true or false.
Interestingly, this same concealment tactic was used in the official story of the attacks of 9/11 by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, (NIST), who fallaciously claimed that “no evidence exists” for explosive/pyrotechnic materials in the WTC buildings, when overwhelming evidence of these materials was found by investigators independent of NIST.
NIST failed to consider explosives or pyrotechnic materials in any of its hypotheses, even though this omission was at odds with the requirement of the national standard for fire investigation which calls for testing related to thermite and other pyrotechnics.
Back to the EPA. The name Environmental Protection Authority has been in use since 2009, applying to a unit of the Ministry for the Environment responsible for administering a section of the Resource Management Act. The Environmental Protection Authority as it is now began operations in July 2011 under its own Act, the Environmental Protection Authority Act 2011. This Act requires the EPA to contribute to the effective and transparent management of New Zealand’s environment and natural and physical resources.
Note that while the EPA claimed in its first letter to Malcolm, dated February the 18th, 2016 that it had not received any information regarding sightings of high altitude aerosol spraying from members of the public, in its second letter dated March the 4th it indicates that it received an email from Mr. W Ryan on February the 18th, 2011, which it referred to the Ministry for the Environment, because the inquiry fell outside the EPA’s responsibility [at that time]. Thus, the EPA staff know that the Ministry for the Environment has correspondence on this issue, as readers of this website know of, and this includes from the Mayor of Kaikoura.
In addition, note that the EPA claims on its website at http://www.epa.govt.nz, that its role under the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) Act is the regulation of pesticides, dangerous goods, household chemicals and other dangerous substances. It further offers: “This means we put controls in place to manage the risks of hazardous substances to safeguard people and the environment.” If only this were true where atmospheric aerosol spraying was concerned.
In addition, former US government employee and respected researcher, Clifford Carnicom has been investigating and reporting on aspects of these aerosols for over a decade, including what they are doing to the environment and our health. Alarmingly, he has evidence to show that aerosol trails are achieving far more than modifying the atmosphere. His research has shown that the aerosols also contain bio-engineered filaments that are infecting the global population with exotic, cross domain bacteria which do not exist in nature.
Therefore, because the EPA denies the existence of these high altitude atmospheric aerosols and refuses to investigate them when a vast body of evidence shows that they are real and harmful, not only is it exhibiting a high degree of negligence and failing in its duty of care under the HSNO Act, but in keeping the public in ignorance and concealing the truth, it is complicit in enabling this crime against humanity and the environment to continue.
“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for a disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist.” – Former US President, Dwight Eisenhower
- CFR on Planetary Geoengineering: “Add more small reflecting particles in the upper part of the atmosphere”
- The Government Is Already “Geo-Engineering” The Environment
- Geoengineering Conference To Discuss Blocking Sun
- Colossal GeoEngineering in Plain Sight
- Rosalind Peterson: The Chemtrail Cover-Up
- Scientists to Create “Artificial Volcano” In Bid to Geoengineer Climate
- Scientists Admit Climate Cooled in the Last Decade, Cite Sulfur Pollution from China
- Rosalind Peterson: The Chemtrail Cover-Up
- U.S. Government Mad Scientists Geo-Engineer Atmosphere
- Scientists Admit Chemtrails Are Creating Artificial Clouds
- Geoengineering Unmonitored
- Concerns About Chemtrails Given Fresh Impetus
17. Frances Mangels Talks To John Whyte About Geoengineering: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9jf_nVLGDTo
19. Chemtrail PsyOps: NBC News Reports Jet “Contrails” Change Our Weather For the “Better” 20. As weatherman, Scott Stevens, who has examined the use of chemtrails using time-lapse equipment has noted however, SRM is a very poor explanation for the chemtrail program, as there is something far deeper, more complex and important than simply “making clouds to keep out sunshine” from an already cooling planet going on.